Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Bill Barr
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrFedEx" data-source="post: 4025379" data-attributes="member: 12508"><p>The fake news is that Barr is the AG and cleared Trump of obstruction of justice. I agree that the Left felt Trump probably colluded and absolutely obstructed, but we'll apparently never get to see the full report nor will the House Intelligence Committee. That means the evidence is very likely there for obstruction.</p><p></p><p>Bill Barr should have recused himself based on the extremely biased conclusions he reached before ever reading the Mueller Report. That's right...he had already decided that a sitting president was immune. Isn't it just a bit odd and stilted that someone who has already made up their mind gets to decide if Trump obstructed? Mueller cleared Trump of collusion, and Barr pre-determined that Trump couldn't have obstructed because a president cannot obstruct....according to Barr.</p><p></p><p>It's all out there in plain sight. Barr wrote opinion pieces citing the above before he ever became AG. Conflict of interest? You bet. The EVIDENCE is strong that Trump selected Barr precisely due to Barr's publicly stated stance on the issue. Barr's opinion pieces were, in essence, a resume for the AG job. All that was missing was an appearance on FOX and Friends.</p><p></p><p>Sorry, but that's just wrong, and not fake news. Just because you got the decision you wanted doesn't make it lawful, ethical, or moral, which are 3 words absent from the Trump World lexicon (look it up).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrFedEx, post: 4025379, member: 12508"] The fake news is that Barr is the AG and cleared Trump of obstruction of justice. I agree that the Left felt Trump probably colluded and absolutely obstructed, but we'll apparently never get to see the full report nor will the House Intelligence Committee. That means the evidence is very likely there for obstruction. Bill Barr should have recused himself based on the extremely biased conclusions he reached before ever reading the Mueller Report. That's right...he had already decided that a sitting president was immune. Isn't it just a bit odd and stilted that someone who has already made up their mind gets to decide if Trump obstructed? Mueller cleared Trump of collusion, and Barr pre-determined that Trump couldn't have obstructed because a president cannot obstruct....according to Barr. It's all out there in plain sight. Barr wrote opinion pieces citing the above before he ever became AG. Conflict of interest? You bet. The EVIDENCE is strong that Trump selected Barr precisely due to Barr's publicly stated stance on the issue. Barr's opinion pieces were, in essence, a resume for the AG job. All that was missing was an appearance on FOX and Friends. Sorry, but that's just wrong, and not fake news. Just because you got the decision you wanted doesn't make it lawful, ethical, or moral, which are 3 words absent from the Trump World lexicon (look it up). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Bill Barr
Top