Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Boycott fedex
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrFedEx" data-source="post: 736716" data-attributes="member: 12508"><p>OK. let's say you are Dean Henderson. The moment his vehicle was struck he turned from an asset into a liability as far as FedEx was concerned. Although I'm sure they said all the right things about "caring about the employee", behind-the-scenes the HR/Legal process was gearing-up to minimize the impact (no pun intended). It's far less costly for a self-insured company to eliminate a liability than to do the right thing, and at FedEx it's always about the money, not the employee.</p><p> </p><p>This is why the arguments of the apologists always ring hollow. Chances are, none of them have had to deal with the dark side of FedEx during their careers. Drinking the Kool-Aid has the serious side effect of seeing the world through rose-colored glasses. The reality is much more harsh. FedEx has always been excellent at promoting an image that doesn't really exist, and that's one of a company that cares in an era where most don't. That's crap, because they don't care unless they're going to have to shell-out some big money in a lawsuit. If you get hurt, the strategy is to starve you out before you can get the matter to court and do everything possible to deflect responsibility away from FedEx. Just ask anyone who has gone through the process.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrFedEx, post: 736716, member: 12508"] OK. let's say you are Dean Henderson. The moment his vehicle was struck he turned from an asset into a liability as far as FedEx was concerned. Although I'm sure they said all the right things about "caring about the employee", behind-the-scenes the HR/Legal process was gearing-up to minimize the impact (no pun intended). It's far less costly for a self-insured company to eliminate a liability than to do the right thing, and at FedEx it's always about the money, not the employee. This is why the arguments of the apologists always ring hollow. Chances are, none of them have had to deal with the dark side of FedEx during their careers. Drinking the Kool-Aid has the serious side effect of seeing the world through rose-colored glasses. The reality is much more harsh. FedEx has always been excellent at promoting an image that doesn't really exist, and that's one of a company that cares in an era where most don't. That's crap, because they don't care unless they're going to have to shell-out some big money in a lawsuit. If you get hurt, the strategy is to starve you out before you can get the matter to court and do everything possible to deflect responsibility away from FedEx. Just ask anyone who has gone through the process. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Boycott fedex
Top