Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Browncafe Boxes (3DS MAX)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Floridacargocat" data-source="post: 318449" data-attributes="member: 6168"><p>Several deficiencies regarding these 3 boxes:</p><p>1. Wet bottoms (indications of either leaking or being exposed to contact with liquids, leading to weakened performance of the box not in line with requirements.</p><p>2. HazMat labels are Class 9 Miscellaneous (that is everything not covered by Clas 1-8).</p><p>3. No marking of boxes that they have been certified to contain HazMat.</p><p>4. No marking re Proper Shipping Name and UN/ID Number</p><p>5. No indication about HazMat declaration attached</p><p> </p><p>If they were real HazMat boxes (and not photo-shopped), why were they accepted by the UPS system?</p><p>If they did <strong><span style="color: red">not</span></strong> contain HazMat, than the HazMat label Class 9 is misleading, which is also in non-compliance with 49CFR.</p><p>In both cases, both shipper and carrier are subject to fines as posted in 49 CFR 107 App.A. Theoretical amount of fines: Can I have this amount as part of my annual paycheck please?</p><p>Question: What was the decision of the managers in charge re allowing the continuation of transport of these boxes (if these boxes were real boxes in the UPS transportation system).</p><p>PS. None of the commenters above noticed these HazMat deficiencies. So, is it a hoax?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Floridacargocat, post: 318449, member: 6168"] Several deficiencies regarding these 3 boxes: 1. Wet bottoms (indications of either leaking or being exposed to contact with liquids, leading to weakened performance of the box not in line with requirements. 2. HazMat labels are Class 9 Miscellaneous (that is everything not covered by Clas 1-8). 3. No marking of boxes that they have been certified to contain HazMat. 4. No marking re Proper Shipping Name and UN/ID Number 5. No indication about HazMat declaration attached If they were real HazMat boxes (and not photo-shopped), why were they accepted by the UPS system? If they did [B][COLOR=red]not[/COLOR][/B] contain HazMat, than the HazMat label Class 9 is misleading, which is also in non-compliance with 49CFR. In both cases, both shipper and carrier are subject to fines as posted in 49 CFR 107 App.A. Theoretical amount of fines: Can I have this amount as part of my annual paycheck please? Question: What was the decision of the managers in charge re allowing the continuation of transport of these boxes (if these boxes were real boxes in the UPS transportation system). PS. None of the commenters above noticed these HazMat deficiencies. So, is it a hoax? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Browncafe Boxes (3DS MAX)
Top