Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
California Supreme Court overturns ban on Gay marriage!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 341594" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>Let me comment on one more aspect of this thread</p><p> </p><p>It has been mentioned that the majority should rule the vote. The problem with this reminds me of a converstion many years ago.</p><p> </p><p>There was an Island with 8 men and two women. The men wanted sex, the women did not. But since the men outnumbered the women, they were able to force the women under their will.</p><p> </p><p>Now, since the majority ruled, did it make it right? Or were there laws broken? Laws that were meant to protect us from ourselves and others that are not law abiding citizens. Now, just because the majority ruled to change the laws, is that right or wrong? And since they declared it normal and right, does that behaviour now become accepted and right?</p><p> </p><p>When I comes to relationships, there have been laws on the books for many years. And for good reason.</p><p> </p><p>The reason for no laws against same sex marrages on the books is that it was so ridiculous an idea in past decades. </p><p> </p><p>And it goes back to the pushing of the extreme. Since there are no laws actually forbiding this exercise, then it must be allowed, condoned and expanded upon. And we dare you to try to block our freedoms by telling us this is not legal and normal.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 341594, member: 484"] Let me comment on one more aspect of this thread It has been mentioned that the majority should rule the vote. The problem with this reminds me of a converstion many years ago. There was an Island with 8 men and two women. The men wanted sex, the women did not. But since the men outnumbered the women, they were able to force the women under their will. Now, since the majority ruled, did it make it right? Or were there laws broken? Laws that were meant to protect us from ourselves and others that are not law abiding citizens. Now, just because the majority ruled to change the laws, is that right or wrong? And since they declared it normal and right, does that behaviour now become accepted and right? When I comes to relationships, there have been laws on the books for many years. And for good reason. The reason for no laws against same sex marrages on the books is that it was so ridiculous an idea in past decades. And it goes back to the pushing of the extreme. Since there are no laws actually forbiding this exercise, then it must be allowed, condoned and expanded upon. And we dare you to try to block our freedoms by telling us this is not legal and normal. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
California Supreme Court overturns ban on Gay marriage!
Top