Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Central supplement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bubblehead" data-source="post: 3654374" data-attributes="member: 14176"><p>[USER=4992]@BigUnionGuy[/USER] , these words have haunted me all day....actually for years.</p><p></p><p>While on the surface they make some sense, inevitably they are gibberish.</p><p></p><p>Article 17 of the Central Region is a detailed "list of cardinal sins", aside from subsection (i)....why?</p><p></p><p>This notion that the IBT should strive to negotiate in the "gray areas", in order to save those who paint outside the lines, doesn't seem to advance the bargaining unit as a whole.</p><p></p><p>Could it be that the desire to save everybody from themselves, is a burden not worthy of the masses?</p><p></p><p>Seriously, shouldn't cardinal be cardinal, and how can it not be specifically defined?</p><p></p><p>We can't stop UPS from throwing <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> against the wall, but why do we continue to entertain it in Central Region Supplemental language?</p><p></p><p>SMH</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>~Bbbl~</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bubblehead, post: 3654374, member: 14176"] [USER=4992]@BigUnionGuy[/USER] , these words have haunted me all day....actually for years. While on the surface they make some sense, inevitably they are gibberish. Article 17 of the Central Region is a detailed "list of cardinal sins", aside from subsection (i)....why? This notion that the IBT should strive to negotiate in the "gray areas", in order to save those who paint outside the lines, doesn't seem to advance the bargaining unit as a whole. Could it be that the desire to save everybody from themselves, is a burden not worthy of the masses? Seriously, shouldn't cardinal be cardinal, and how can it not be specifically defined? We can't stop UPS from throwing :censored: against the wall, but why do we continue to entertain it in Central Region Supplemental language? SMH ~Bbbl~ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Central supplement
Top