Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dave_socal" data-source="post: 180433" data-attributes="member: 5582">Agreed my point exactly. Comes down to your personal ethics and integrity as to whether you feel you were harmed.&nbsp;And thats part of the discussion here , trying to figure out how those who were not hurt on the lunch issue justified taking this money. </blockquote>Yes its comes down to a personal choice, but Tieguy you are trying to frame this as a reflection character and ethics, integrity. It seems to me you and anyone who objects to this pay out have a very pious and smug attitude toward those of us who have had to actually make this (un)ethical desicion. It&#039;s very easy to assume and preach what you might do. I balk at any assertion that you might convey that we are somehow doing an injustice to this company. No one I&#039;ve spoken to has said I don&#039;t want this money regardless of circumstance, does this make us all less principled than you? I can most assuredly state that 99% of everyone around you management or not would accept this without a blink of an eye. You should leave the pondering to those who have the decision before them without you aspersions about our intergrity. Its funny how over the years of seeing UPS do right and wrong to me and others, I never took it personaly because ultimately I knew what UPS is, an emotionless corporation that will proceed with or without me. This money is not going to change anybodys life or job so why even bother yourself with a non dilemma. I&#039;m a substantial stockholder of this company, I want nothing more than to see UPS profit from my work so I too can gain. If you would like a list of grievence&#039;s I&#039;ve never filed lets start a new thread, but I don&#039;t feel the need to justify any futher why accepting this offer is no big deal. I would like most management to justify their worth it obivious that ones with the least callused hands are troubled most.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="dave_socal, post: 180433, member: 5582"] [COLOR=blue]Agreed my point exactly. Comes down to your personal ethics and integrity as to whether you feel you were harmed.[/COLOR] [COLOR=blue]And thats part of the discussion here , trying to figure out how those who were not hurt on the lunch issue justified taking this money. [/COLOR][/quote] Yes its comes down to a personal choice, but Tieguy you are trying to frame this as a reflection character and ethics, integrity. It seems to me you and anyone who objects to this pay out have a very pious and smug attitude toward those of us who have had to actually make this (un)ethical desicion. It's very easy to assume and preach what you might do. I balk at any assertion that you might convey that we are somehow doing an injustice to this company. No one I've spoken to has said I don't want this money regardless of circumstance, does this make us all less principled than you? I can most assuredly state that 99% of everyone around you management or not would accept this without a blink of an eye. You should leave the pondering to those who have the decision before them without you aspersions about our intergrity. Its funny how over the years of seeing UPS do right and wrong to me and others, I never took it personaly because ultimately I knew what UPS is, an emotionless corporation that will proceed with or without me. This money is not going to change anybodys life or job so why even bother yourself with a non dilemma. I'm a substantial stockholder of this company, I want nothing more than to see UPS profit from my work so I too can gain. If you would like a list of grievence's I've never filed lets start a new thread, but I don't feel the need to justify any futher why accepting this offer is no big deal. I would like most management to justify their worth it obivious that ones with the least callused hands are troubled most. [/QUOTE]

Verification