Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Iconoclast" data-source="post: 183852" data-attributes="member: 8906">Tieguy -Which is what makes this case in california unique in that it is basically a victimless case. As such this case then becomes nothing more then class action welfare due to some serious flaws in the process. &nbsp;Where is your proof in that? How are you determining that nobody was hurt in this class action process? Where is the logic and reason behind that statement. The absence of anybody coming forward in this forum to tell you that they were wronged is not proof that it didn&#039;t happen. You cannot not prove it either way, neither can I - you can only apply deductive reasoning to the situation. &nbsp;Would UPS settle a lawsuit that damaged nobody? that had no victims and was completely without base and merit? I say emphatically No. &nbsp;What is the logic behind my statement? It would set very serious legal precedence for others to bring similar suits, completely without merit, against UPS. Free money attracts a crowd. I don&#039;t think UPS or its legal team can afford to set such precedence.&nbsp;&nbsp;What is your logic behind your opinion, why do you think UPS settled a suit where nobody was harmed? Again, I am not asking you if either of us has proof, we don&#039;t, but support your argument with some reasonable explanation, other than just conjecture.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Iconoclast, post: 183852, member: 8906"] [COLOR=#0000ff]Tieguy -Which is what makes this case in california unique in that it is basically a victimless case. As such this case then becomes nothing more then class action welfare due to some serious flaws in the process. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Where is your proof in that? How are you determining that nobody was hurt in this class action process? Where is the logic and reason behind that statement. The absence of anybody coming forward in this forum to tell you that they were wronged is not proof that it didn't happen. You cannot not prove it either way, neither can I - you can only apply deductive reasoning to the situation. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]Would UPS settle a lawsuit that damaged nobody? that had no victims and was completely without base and merit? I say emphatically No. [/COLOR] [COLOR=black]What is the logic behind my statement? It would set very serious legal precedence for others to bring similar suits, completely without merit, against UPS. Free money attracts a crowd. I don't think UPS or its legal team can afford to set such precedence.[/COLOR] [COLOR=black]What is your logic behind your opinion, why do you think UPS settled a suit where nobody was harmed? Again, I am not asking you if either of us has proof, we don't, but support your argument with some reasonable explanation, other than just conjecture.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification