Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
class action lawsuit against UPS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iconoclast" data-source="post: 189018" data-attributes="member: 8906"><p><span style="color: #0000ff"><strong><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-size: 12px">Tieguy</span> </span></strong>- Fdx just settled one in California ( imagine that same state) for 55 million. Lawsuit accused them of discrimanatory practices because of a pre-employment test they required. </span></p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">You need to pull your emphatic No and rethink your position. The class action lawsuit climate in california is forcing a lot of large companies to settle on these fishing expeditions. Fdx is either discriminating in a time of shrinking labor pools or the legal language in this state is so tilted against them that they feel they can not win. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">Now if you feel that justice was served on behalf of those who could not pass this pre-employment test then move on, if however you think the latter is the case then you have a real potential crisis in which companies who feel the conditions in California are unfavorable will move out. Oops never mind already happening. </span></p><p> </p><p>PagnPink said it best - </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: red">I, too, took a logic class in college where you break down questions, and in a fashion similar to mathematics, determine whether they are true or false. There are many types of fallacious (false) arguments, often labeled in Latin, such as those labeled "ad ignoratium" or "argument from ignorance". An example would be "I have never seen a yellow dog, so therefore there are no yellow dogs" The fact that you have never seen a yellow dog doesn't prove that there are none. The type of argument cited above by some people in a previous post is called, in simple terms," begging the question" , because the answer is already assumed in the question</span></em></p><p> </p><p>How you can make such sweeping assimilations betwix meritless lawsuits and ones with teeth is beyond comprehension, unless, you are just begging the question. </p><p> </p><p>You made some definitive statements about this suit, do you care to back any of that up with logical examples, dutiful thought or educated hypothesis? Or, will your answer to this post be a single sentence hinged on semantics?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iconoclast, post: 189018, member: 8906"] [COLOR=#0000ff][B][SIZE=4][SIZE=3]Tieguy[/SIZE] [/SIZE][/B]- Fdx just settled one in California ( imagine that same state) for 55 million. Lawsuit accused them of discrimanatory practices because of a pre-employment test they required. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]You need to pull your emphatic No and rethink your position. The class action lawsuit climate in california is forcing a lot of large companies to settle on these fishing expeditions. Fdx is either discriminating in a time of shrinking labor pools or the legal language in this state is so tilted against them that they feel they can not win. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]Now if you feel that justice was served on behalf of those who could not pass this pre-employment test then move on, if however you think the latter is the case then you have a real potential crisis in which companies who feel the conditions in California are unfavorable will move out. Oops never mind already happening. [/COLOR] PagnPink said it best - [I][COLOR=red]I, too, took a logic class in college where you break down questions, and in a fashion similar to mathematics, determine whether they are true or false. There are many types of fallacious (false) arguments, often labeled in Latin, such as those labeled "ad ignoratium" or "argument from ignorance". An example would be "I have never seen a yellow dog, so therefore there are no yellow dogs" The fact that you have never seen a yellow dog doesn't prove that there are none. The type of argument cited above by some people in a previous post is called, in simple terms," begging the question" , because the answer is already assumed in the question[/COLOR][/I] How you can make such sweeping assimilations betwix meritless lawsuits and ones with teeth is beyond comprehension, unless, you are just begging the question. You made some definitive statements about this suit, do you care to back any of that up with logical examples, dutiful thought or educated hypothesis? Or, will your answer to this post be a single sentence hinged on semantics? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
class action lawsuit against UPS
Top