Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 1747722" data-attributes="member: 44954">If he had stayed outside his vehicle, I&#039;d agree he could have legally shot someone.&nbsp; He would also be a piece of <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> for it.&nbsp; It would have been a completely legal, piece of <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" /> thing to do.&nbsp; The right thing to do was just drive away, which is what he did.&nbsp; You want to stick around and murder someone because you&#039;re upset they took your flag and threw stuff at your car, that&#039;s on you.Using the castle doctrine in this case is a thin defense.&nbsp; He very well might be able to hide behind that law, but it would be up for interpretation.&nbsp; No one was reaching in his vehicle.&nbsp; If they had broken a window, or tried to open the door, it would be a clear cut case.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 1747722, member: 44954"] If he had stayed outside his vehicle, I'd agree he could have legally shot someone. He would also be a piece of :censored: for it. It would have been a completely legal, piece of :censored: thing to do. The right thing to do was just drive away, which is what he did. You want to stick around and murder someone because you're upset they took your flag and threw stuff at your car, that's on you. Using the castle doctrine in this case is a thin defense. He very well might be able to hide behind that law, but it would be up for interpretation. No one was reaching in his vehicle. If they had broken a window, or tried to open the door, it would be a clear cut case. [/QUOTE]

Verification