Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Congratulations to my LOCAL 396!! Victory for the incumbents!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 899014" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>I realize that your explanation is the kind of ridiculous interpretation that the G clan took from the report, but the facts are the facts. NOWHERE in the election officers report is J. Phillips accused of lying about being attacked.</p><p></p><p>What the election official found, was the Phillips exaggerated the event, but when you look at all the facts, including P Galvans OWN words, she attacked him in the Ballys hotel without provocation.</p><p></p><p>P. Galvans OWN words in her statement state that she intended on CONFRONTING J. Phillips and decided to do so when she saw him walking away from her at the hotel. From behind, she GRABBED Phillips placing one hand on his arm and the other on his chest....</p><p></p><p>I dont know where you got your law degree from, but that is called a "simple battery", the exact charge the Metro Vegas PD charged her with by citation. In addition, the hotel security, after interviewing G and watching the various video tapes of the event, EJECTED both she and R. G from the hotel.</p><p></p><p>The election officer clearly validates this in his report. </p><p></p><p>I realize you want to extrapolate certain parts of the election officers report and leave out the facts, but you cant have it that way. The report contains ALL the assertained facts of the case.</p><p></p><p>Phillips was only held responsible for "exaggeratting" the severity of the event and NOT THE CHARGE.</p><p></p><p>Looking at the facts, its easy to see how Phillips recollection may differ from the actual events given the fact that he was attacked from behind and never saw P G approaching. You have to remember that the elections officer is NOT a criminal investigator nor a policeman nor a detective.</p><p></p><p>All they can do is gather all the "FACTS" and reports and make a judgement. </p><p></p><p>If you are purporting to represent that P G did not attack J. Phillips from the rear and place her hands onto Mr Phillips person, then you are a bigger idiot than I gave you credit for being.</p><p></p><p>Mr Phillips was sanctioned for his "mis statements", but that did not prove P Galvans innocence. A Los Angeles Superior court judge viewed all the security tapes of the incident and ruled in J Phillips favor stating the VIDEOS SPOKE FOR THEMSELVES. P G was not allowed to speak in her defense as the JUDGE felt it was not necessary. A THREE YEAR restraining order is in place and against P G.</p><p></p><p>I noticed you did not DENY the restraining order, but that figures. Maybe you dont want to recognize that the threshold for a battery was met and the legal system ruled that P G was a threat to J Phillips.</p><p></p><p>What you want to discuss is exactly why you helped lose the election. You dont deal in facts. You want to take favorable portions of something and make a mountain out of it. P Galvans own words admit to attacking Phillips without cause. She sounds like a kook, with claims of crank phone calls, her car vandalized, sexual advancements made to her by 396 officers ( and personally, I wouldnt make such an advance to her) and other kooky claims that she felt J Phillips was responsible for.</p><p></p><p>But, when asked by the police about these claims, and what proof she had, she stated she had ZERO proof. Those are her own words. That makes her attack on Phillips even more ridiculous.</p><p></p><p>You can take things out of context or leave out facts, thats the methodology of Dave Martinez. Its something I hope R G gets away from if hes to get his dignity back.</p><p></p><p>Peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 899014, member: 17969"] I realize that your explanation is the kind of ridiculous interpretation that the G clan took from the report, but the facts are the facts. NOWHERE in the election officers report is J. Phillips accused of lying about being attacked. What the election official found, was the Phillips exaggerated the event, but when you look at all the facts, including P Galvans OWN words, she attacked him in the Ballys hotel without provocation. P. Galvans OWN words in her statement state that she intended on CONFRONTING J. Phillips and decided to do so when she saw him walking away from her at the hotel. From behind, she GRABBED Phillips placing one hand on his arm and the other on his chest.... I dont know where you got your law degree from, but that is called a "simple battery", the exact charge the Metro Vegas PD charged her with by citation. In addition, the hotel security, after interviewing G and watching the various video tapes of the event, EJECTED both she and R. G from the hotel. The election officer clearly validates this in his report. I realize you want to extrapolate certain parts of the election officers report and leave out the facts, but you cant have it that way. The report contains ALL the assertained facts of the case. Phillips was only held responsible for "exaggeratting" the severity of the event and NOT THE CHARGE. Looking at the facts, its easy to see how Phillips recollection may differ from the actual events given the fact that he was attacked from behind and never saw P G approaching. You have to remember that the elections officer is NOT a criminal investigator nor a policeman nor a detective. All they can do is gather all the "FACTS" and reports and make a judgement. If you are purporting to represent that P G did not attack J. Phillips from the rear and place her hands onto Mr Phillips person, then you are a bigger idiot than I gave you credit for being. Mr Phillips was sanctioned for his "mis statements", but that did not prove P Galvans innocence. A Los Angeles Superior court judge viewed all the security tapes of the incident and ruled in J Phillips favor stating the VIDEOS SPOKE FOR THEMSELVES. P G was not allowed to speak in her defense as the JUDGE felt it was not necessary. A THREE YEAR restraining order is in place and against P G. I noticed you did not DENY the restraining order, but that figures. Maybe you dont want to recognize that the threshold for a battery was met and the legal system ruled that P G was a threat to J Phillips. What you want to discuss is exactly why you helped lose the election. You dont deal in facts. You want to take favorable portions of something and make a mountain out of it. P Galvans own words admit to attacking Phillips without cause. She sounds like a kook, with claims of crank phone calls, her car vandalized, sexual advancements made to her by 396 officers ( and personally, I wouldnt make such an advance to her) and other kooky claims that she felt J Phillips was responsible for. But, when asked by the police about these claims, and what proof she had, she stated she had ZERO proof. Those are her own words. That makes her attack on Phillips even more ridiculous. You can take things out of context or leave out facts, thats the methodology of Dave Martinez. Its something I hope R G gets away from if hes to get his dignity back. Peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Congratulations to my LOCAL 396!! Victory for the incumbents!
Top