Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Continually over 9.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scooby0048" data-source="post: 4221216" data-attributes="member: 50693"><p>I see the confusion. For this example though, it doesn't matter if it is days or weeks just 6-8 times violated. If the appellant was worked over twice a week it would still equate to three or four weeks being put over. That's excessive no doubt. And, for that he, (appellant) should have been awarded the penalty pay. If the appellant worked over just one day a week, he would be put over 6-8 weeks. That's also excessive when it is roughly 1/4 of the entire time being on the 9.5 list.</p><p></p><p>For both those examples the appellant was worked roughly 1/4 to 1/5 of the five months which is excessive. The point is, the case presented was abysmally weak and should never have been brought forth and in doing so, it caused an unfavorable arbitration which means from this point on, we will need to document document document to build a strong case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scooby0048, post: 4221216, member: 50693"] I see the confusion. For this example though, it doesn't matter if it is days or weeks just 6-8 times violated. If the appellant was worked over twice a week it would still equate to three or four weeks being put over. That's excessive no doubt. And, for that he, (appellant) should have been awarded the penalty pay. If the appellant worked over just one day a week, he would be put over 6-8 weeks. That's also excessive when it is roughly 1/4 of the entire time being on the 9.5 list. For both those examples the appellant was worked roughly 1/4 to 1/5 of the five months which is excessive. The point is, the case presented was abysmally weak and should never have been brought forth and in doing so, it caused an unfavorable arbitration which means from this point on, we will need to document document document to build a strong case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Continually over 9.5
Top