Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Contract leader O'brien
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mugarolla" data-source="post: 2683674" data-attributes="member: 8481"><p>No, I said I would have supported it if that was the reason for the change. It was not. Teamcare was very healthy before we were infused. There was no need to change so no, I did not support it for the reasons that they did it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, investors liked it because it took away any uncertainty in the future. Investors don't like uncertainty.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, the change was only necessary to keep investors happy, not to keep premiums down.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're welcome!</p><p></p><p>Seriously, there are many employees in a better HC plan than I am in. I am not wanting their benefits reduced to my level just for the sake of all being equal.</p><p></p><p>I am going to fight to get to their level. If I don't get there, so be it. I am not bitter that they have a better plan than I do. More power to them.</p><p></p><p>There are many employees in a better pension plan than I am in. I am not wanting their benefits reduced to my level just for the sake of all being equal.</p><p></p><p>I am going to fight to get to their level. If I don't get there, so be it. I am not bitter that they have a better plan than I do. More power to them.</p><p></p><p>There are many employees that have better language in their supplements than I have. I am not wanting their language removed just for the sake of all being equal.</p><p></p><p>I am going to fight to get to their language into my supplement. If I don't get there, so be it. I am not bitter that they have better language than I do. More power to them.</p><p></p><p>About the only thing the Teamsters push is equal pay, besides the progression, not equal benefits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mugarolla, post: 2683674, member: 8481"] No, I said I would have supported it if that was the reason for the change. It was not. Teamcare was very healthy before we were infused. There was no need to change so no, I did not support it for the reasons that they did it. No, investors liked it because it took away any uncertainty in the future. Investors don't like uncertainty. No, the change was only necessary to keep investors happy, not to keep premiums down. You're welcome! Seriously, there are many employees in a better HC plan than I am in. I am not wanting their benefits reduced to my level just for the sake of all being equal. I am going to fight to get to their level. If I don't get there, so be it. I am not bitter that they have a better plan than I do. More power to them. There are many employees in a better pension plan than I am in. I am not wanting their benefits reduced to my level just for the sake of all being equal. I am going to fight to get to their level. If I don't get there, so be it. I am not bitter that they have a better plan than I do. More power to them. There are many employees that have better language in their supplements than I have. I am not wanting their language removed just for the sake of all being equal. I am going to fight to get to their language into my supplement. If I don't get there, so be it. I am not bitter that they have better language than I do. More power to them. About the only thing the Teamsters push is equal pay, besides the progression, not equal benefits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Contract leader O'brien
Top