Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Corporate abuse: Unfair labor practices exposing violation-Civil Rights Act of 1964
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeniorGeek" data-source="post: 185513" data-attributes="member: 4823"><p><strong>Re: Corporate abuse: Unfair labor practices exposing violation-Civil Rights Act of 19</strong></p><p></p><p>I think that presence in a place of business implies consent to be recorded. I know that lots of businesses record without warning customers and/or employees. </p><p> </p><p>The tough part is figuring out whether that implies a two-way street. The details are probably spelled out in UPS policies and labor contracts. Electronically recorded evidence is not to be used against IBT members, but it can still be used for investigation.</p><p> </p><p><u>Laws</u> (which is a slight change-of-subject from ethics<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/sad.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":sad:" title="Sad :sad:" data-shortname=":sad:" /> ) vary by location, and my knowledge is dated, but Oregon laws (used to?) allow anyone who is party to an <u>in-person</u> conversation to record it without notifying others. </p><p> </p><p>Exception: It is illegal to record an on-duty police officer without permission. (Does this mean they have something to hide?)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeniorGeek, post: 185513, member: 4823"] [b]Re: Corporate abuse: Unfair labor practices exposing violation-Civil Rights Act of 19[/b] I think that presence in a place of business implies consent to be recorded. I know that lots of businesses record without warning customers and/or employees. The tough part is figuring out whether that implies a two-way street. The details are probably spelled out in UPS policies and labor contracts. Electronically recorded evidence is not to be used against IBT members, but it can still be used for investigation. [U]Laws[/U] (which is a slight change-of-subject from ethics:sad: ) vary by location, and my knowledge is dated, but Oregon laws (used to?) allow anyone who is party to an [U]in-person[/U] conversation to record it without notifying others. Exception: It is illegal to record an on-duty police officer without permission. (Does this mean they have something to hide?) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Corporate abuse: Unfair labor practices exposing violation-Civil Rights Act of 1964
Top