Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
CRIME
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1310981" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>Again, lets try to understand whats at play here. In your link, it says:</p><p></p><p>"Given the finding of <strong><span style="font-size: 18px">homicide</span></strong>—and the corroborating evidence at the crime scene—the Chicago Police Department <strong><span style="font-size: 18px">should have</span></strong> counted Groves’s death as a murder. And it did. Until December 18. On that day, the police report indicates, a lieutenant overseeing the Groves case reclassified the homicide investigation as a <strong><span style="font-size: 22px">noncriminal death investigation</span></strong>. In his writeup, <strong><span style="font-size: 18px">he cited</span></strong> the medical examiner’s “<strong><span style="font-size: 18px">inability to determine a cause of death</span></strong>.”</p><p></p><p>If you can determine how a person DIED, then you cant have a murder. What killed the woman? Drugs? Heroin? Alcohol? Heart Attack? Torture? Who knows, the medical examiner is UNABLE to determine a cause of death, and because of that, you cant have a CRIMINAL to look for.</p><p></p><p>You want to make mountains out of molehills. Circumstances folks, is the key to the classification.</p><p></p><p>If you want to believe that the MAYOR, along with the medical examiner, along with the homocide detectives, along with the entire hierachy of the Chicago police force would deliberately conspire to eliminate a murder intentionally from the books, then you will believe anything and there is no help for you.</p><p></p><p>TOS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1310981, member: 17969"] Again, lets try to understand whats at play here. In your link, it says: "Given the finding of [B][SIZE=5]homicide[/SIZE][/B]—and the corroborating evidence at the crime scene—the Chicago Police Department [B][SIZE=5]should have[/SIZE][/B] counted Groves’s death as a murder. And it did. Until December 18. On that day, the police report indicates, a lieutenant overseeing the Groves case reclassified the homicide investigation as a [B][SIZE=6]noncriminal death investigation[/SIZE][/B]. In his writeup, [B][SIZE=5]he cited[/SIZE][/B] the medical examiner’s “[B][SIZE=5]inability to determine a cause of death[/SIZE][/B].” If you can determine how a person DIED, then you cant have a murder. What killed the woman? Drugs? Heroin? Alcohol? Heart Attack? Torture? Who knows, the medical examiner is UNABLE to determine a cause of death, and because of that, you cant have a CRIMINAL to look for. You want to make mountains out of molehills. Circumstances folks, is the key to the classification. If you want to believe that the MAYOR, along with the medical examiner, along with the homocide detectives, along with the entire hierachy of the Chicago police force would deliberately conspire to eliminate a murder intentionally from the books, then you will believe anything and there is no help for you. TOS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
CRIME
Top