Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Dark day in my center
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="6 comm 3centerdispatch" data-source="post: 210744"><p>* Profit is defined as $$$ left after cost including our top rate rates.</p><p></p><p></p><p>* It's not the point to give us more raises. That's not at all THE POINT. </p><p></p><p></p><p>* The point is that there is obvious room to reduce prices by cutting into the profit. (90 billion dollars worth).</p><p></p><p></p><p>* It's not our high pay rate thats keeping our price to the costumer from being more aggressive. it's the high profit that corp keeps building even after our top rate.</p><p></p><p></p><p>* Would it hurt to profit $70 billion ,(instead of $90 billion), and $20 billion gets back to our costumer base via reduced price, keeping our top rate as is. It would benifit by gaining more volume and profit will go up do to increased volume and less risk of lossing more big accounts do to price.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>* Do you see anyone in here saying we need paid more cause of the large profit. I don't. The discussion is keeping accounts and not lossing the large one's.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the problem is that we have boiled frogs for management.</p><p></p><p>Management is more worried about how things look on paper rather then the truth.</p><p></p><p>Example, "duplicate stops", complete B.S.</p><p></p><p>We should be credited for making an extra trip going out of our way to make a 2nd attempt.</p><p></p><p>yea, I'm going to same place a 2nd time. Yea costumer request or management request but It doesn't change the fact that it is an additional stop. Especially through the day and you have quit a few 2nd attemps.</p><p></p><p>Oops I think i just got into a whole nother topic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="6 comm 3centerdispatch, post: 210744"] * Profit is defined as $$$ left after cost including our top rate rates. * It's not the point to give us more raises. That's not at all THE POINT. * The point is that there is obvious room to reduce prices by cutting into the profit. (90 billion dollars worth). * It's not our high pay rate thats keeping our price to the costumer from being more aggressive. it's the high profit that corp keeps building even after our top rate. * Would it hurt to profit $70 billion ,(instead of $90 billion), and $20 billion gets back to our costumer base via reduced price, keeping our top rate as is. It would benifit by gaining more volume and profit will go up do to increased volume and less risk of lossing more big accounts do to price. * Do you see anyone in here saying we need paid more cause of the large profit. I don't. The discussion is keeping accounts and not lossing the large one's. I think the problem is that we have boiled frogs for management. Management is more worried about how things look on paper rather then the truth. Example, "duplicate stops", complete B.S. We should be credited for making an extra trip going out of our way to make a 2nd attempt. yea, I'm going to same place a 2nd time. Yea costumer request or management request but It doesn't change the fact that it is an additional stop. Especially through the day and you have quit a few 2nd attemps. Oops I think i just got into a whole nother topic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Dark day in my center
Top