Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrownArmy" data-source="post: 4109583" data-attributes="member: 18225">Lulz, this is why most posters won’t engage you in discussion...you’re a mess.Oh well, here goes:I’m not dodging anything, you just don’t agree with my answers.I’m not the one who brought up ‘science’ in relation to ‘proven’ Biblical ‘miracles’.Science (from the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin" target="_blank">Latin</a> word scientia, meaning &quot;knowledge&quot;)<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-1" target="_blank">[1]</a> is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge" target="_blank">knowledge</a> in the form of testable <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanation" target="_blank">explanations</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions" target="_blank">predictions</a> about the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe" target="_blank">universe</a>.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-EOWilson1999a-2" target="_blank">[2]</a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-Heilbron-3" target="_blank">[3]</a><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-webster-4" target="_blank">[4]</a>That&#039;s it.&nbsp; Nothing more, nothing less.What frustrates me about conversations like the one we&#039;re having is that there doesn&#039;t need to be a divide between science and religion.Science, as I and literally everyone else knows, is simply the study of our observable Universe, with a methodology that self-corrects for new information.&nbsp;&nbsp; No more, no less.Religion is a completely different mechanism.Faith, belief, etc., these are concepts outside of the Scientific Method (<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method" target="_blank">link</a>).Religion is a completely different vector.I get frustrated because folk like you can&#039;t let science and religion coexist.When you drag science into the Bible, you degrade both.Carry on.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrownArmy, post: 4109583, member: 18225"] Lulz, this is why most posters won’t engage you in discussion...you’re a mess. Oh well, here goes: I’m not dodging anything, you just don’t agree with my answers. I’m not the one who brought up ‘science’ in relation to ‘proven’ Biblical ‘miracles’. [B]Science[/B] (from the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin']Latin[/URL] word [I]scientia[/I], meaning "knowledge")[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-1'][1][/URL] is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge']knowledge[/URL] in the form of testable [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanation']explanations[/URL] and [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions']predictions[/URL] about the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe']universe[/URL].[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-EOWilson1999a-2'][2][/URL][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-Heilbron-3'][3][/URL][URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science#cite_note-webster-4'][4][/URL] That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. What frustrates me about conversations like the one we're having is that there doesn't need to be a divide between science and religion. Science, as I and literally everyone else knows, is simply the study of our observable Universe, with a methodology that self-corrects for new information. No more, no less. Religion is a completely different mechanism. Faith, belief, etc., these are concepts outside of the Scientific Method ([URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method']link[/URL]). Religion is a completely different vector. I get frustrated because folk like you can't let science and religion coexist. When you drag science into the Bible, you degrade both. Carry on. [/QUOTE]

Verification