Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Differences in contracts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 387625" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p><span style="color: blue">Ah you put me in a difficult situation. I obviously want 705 to sell this contract to its membersand bring peace back to the valley<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">705 does have some interesting language in its contract that I have not seen before. Some things are up to interpretation. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">For example Red proudly claims that their contract has no act of god language allowing supervisors to work. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">However the basic language is still in place that states the company has to exhaust all other means to use union labor first. This generally implies the concept that the company can use management labor once they have exhausted all other options to use union labor. Its a basic concept that protects the companys rights to provide a service and the unions rights to the labor supplied. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 387625, member: 1912"] [COLOR=blue]Ah you put me in a difficult situation. I obviously want 705 to sell this contract to its membersand bring peace back to the valley:happy-very:[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]705 does have some interesting language in its contract that I have not seen before. Some things are up to interpretation. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]For example Red proudly claims that their contract has no act of god language allowing supervisors to work. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]However the basic language is still in place that states the company has to exhaust all other means to use union labor first. This generally implies the concept that the company can use management labor once they have exhausted all other options to use union labor. Its a basic concept that protects the companys rights to provide a service and the unions rights to the labor supplied. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Differences in contracts
Top