Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Disturbing New Development
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 3537716" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>Still comes down to the same issue. It is privileged information but unfortunately there is no language describing the specific information the contractor has to provide in order to be so called "compliant" and calls into question whether the information they require in order to be "compliant" is information they are <strong>lawfully</strong> entitled to. </p><p>Same thing with the reassignment clause. Every time I called into question the absence of contractual rules and guidelines regarding when and where the reassignment clause can be exercised I got the same evasive answer....."well, it's subjective". " Subject to what"? I asked. No answer</p><p>So if you guys enjoy being cuffed while putting your name to a contract that continues to provide you, your interests and your investment with zero protections go right ahead. But you would think that after all these years there would finally emerge some organized resistance along with the demand that at least some language be installed that would offer basic economic protections giving the ever increasing capital requirements .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 3537716, member: 58386"] Still comes down to the same issue. It is privileged information but unfortunately there is no language describing the specific information the contractor has to provide in order to be so called "compliant" and calls into question whether the information they require in order to be "compliant" is information they are [B]lawfully[/B] entitled to. Same thing with the reassignment clause. Every time I called into question the absence of contractual rules and guidelines regarding when and where the reassignment clause can be exercised I got the same evasive answer....."well, it's subjective". " Subject to what"? I asked. No answer So if you guys enjoy being cuffed while putting your name to a contract that continues to provide you, your interests and your investment with zero protections go right ahead. But you would think that after all these years there would finally emerge some organized resistance along with the demand that at least some language be installed that would offer basic economic protections giving the ever increasing capital requirements . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Disturbing New Development
Top