Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Disturbing New Development
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 3539087" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>My focus was on the X practice of demanding access to information of a privileged nature protected and secured by privacy laws. Where is the line that stops them from going as far as they deem necessary in the pursuit of preventing loss and securing their interests? It has to be there somewhere but what means do contractors have to stop them at that line? The answer of course is zero. Offer even token resistance and you're gone.</p><p>I believe that the SCOTUS case you're talking about involved government employees and their almost limitless ability to sue the government. SCOTUS in it's ruling required greater use of arbitration than in the past.</p><p>As far as the current arbitration process involving X and contractors I don't see the SCOTUS ruling having much of an impact. X will continue to control the entire flow of events making the contractor's chance of prevailing so low that it's really not a viable option.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 3539087, member: 58386"] My focus was on the X practice of demanding access to information of a privileged nature protected and secured by privacy laws. Where is the line that stops them from going as far as they deem necessary in the pursuit of preventing loss and securing their interests? It has to be there somewhere but what means do contractors have to stop them at that line? The answer of course is zero. Offer even token resistance and you're gone. I believe that the SCOTUS case you're talking about involved government employees and their almost limitless ability to sue the government. SCOTUS in it's ruling required greater use of arbitration than in the past. As far as the current arbitration process involving X and contractors I don't see the SCOTUS ruling having much of an impact. X will continue to control the entire flow of events making the contractor's chance of prevailing so low that it's really not a viable option. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Disturbing New Development
Top