Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Documenting delays
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 854314" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>What you described is an absolutely wrong thing for them to do. I am 100% against that.</p><p></p><p>When you say "you guys", that should mean YOUR management. I have never directed anyone to "massage" a three day ride. It is never an action that I would teach or condone. The cards should fall as they may. </p><p></p><p>Three day rides should be targeted at employees who have true performance issues and a load does not need to be massaged to demonstrate that.</p><p></p><p>I have seen countless cases where all it takes is one day on car with a driver to see the performance improvements. Three day rides just ensure a larger base.</p><p></p><p>So in the case where the load was "massaged", I agree that the ride(s) are invalid. I would think that would be easy to document.</p><p></p><p>Would you agree that when the load is NOT "massaged", a three day ride is a valid and fair way to document performance expectations?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 854314, member: 927"] What you described is an absolutely wrong thing for them to do. I am 100% against that. When you say "you guys", that should mean YOUR management. I have never directed anyone to "massage" a three day ride. It is never an action that I would teach or condone. The cards should fall as they may. Three day rides should be targeted at employees who have true performance issues and a load does not need to be massaged to demonstrate that. I have seen countless cases where all it takes is one day on car with a driver to see the performance improvements. Three day rides just ensure a larger base. So in the case where the load was "massaged", I agree that the ride(s) are invalid. I would think that would be easy to document. Would you agree that when the load is NOT "massaged", a three day ride is a valid and fair way to document performance expectations? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Documenting delays
Top