Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
dow 27000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3834436" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>You've already stated that you don't think Republicans should receive Social Security benefits. We should be required to pay into them, but not receive them according to you. Please name one social program I'm against? I'm against keeping able bodied people dependent on government support. That's it. Not against having that help for those between jobs or who physically can't work. I'm against excessive spending in every area of government. That's it. I'm against forcing people to buy something they don't want, and against the lying to get that program passed, resulting in millions of people having to pay a lot more for less quality. That's medical care of course, but that concept applies to anything. And I'm against government officials getting rich while in office, which seems to happen on both sides of the aisle, but is particularly bad when someone uses the actual power of their office to cash in. And gets covered for it. Legal minds didn't say she was innocent, and it has already come out Comey had written a letter of exoneration about two months before even interviewing her. That FBI management handled the investigation, not their normal investigators. She wasn't even put under oath in her interview. So there's another set of rules for the rich and powerful. Doubtful however that Trump would've been extended the same courtesy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3834436, member: 24302"] You've already stated that you don't think Republicans should receive Social Security benefits. We should be required to pay into them, but not receive them according to you. Please name one social program I'm against? I'm against keeping able bodied people dependent on government support. That's it. Not against having that help for those between jobs or who physically can't work. I'm against excessive spending in every area of government. That's it. I'm against forcing people to buy something they don't want, and against the lying to get that program passed, resulting in millions of people having to pay a lot more for less quality. That's medical care of course, but that concept applies to anything. And I'm against government officials getting rich while in office, which seems to happen on both sides of the aisle, but is particularly bad when someone uses the actual power of their office to cash in. And gets covered for it. Legal minds didn't say she was innocent, and it has already come out Comey had written a letter of exoneration about two months before even interviewing her. That FBI management handled the investigation, not their normal investigators. She wasn't even put under oath in her interview. So there's another set of rules for the rich and powerful. Doubtful however that Trump would've been extended the same courtesy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
dow 27000
Top