Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Election 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rickyb" data-source="post: 2110590" data-attributes="member: 56035"><p>ok well lets change it again. lets say someone watches a violent movie and then goes and shoots a bunch of people. did the movie makers have an effect on that persons violence? certainly because you obviously cant say that a violent movie doesnt have SOME kind of effect on people. but it probably doesnt mean were not gonna have violent movies. question would be if were gonna have violent movies, HOW are we gonna have violent movies? so we plan for this by a rating system, we try and teach people not to be violent, etc.</p><p></p><p>guns are dangerous too. question do you plan enough or not enough for the negative consequences of gun, or car, or violent movies.</p><p></p><p>back i dunno before the 1970s cars were made for style not safety, and the automakers knew this and covered it up because they wanted to push style. so automakers said if you get in an accident, its the drivers fault not theirs, which was bull<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2 :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />. so hood ornaments impaled people, steering columns hurt people, etc. so they got regulated more and cars are safer. doesnt mean regulations are always good, or always bad. it can be either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rickyb, post: 2110590, member: 56035"] ok well lets change it again. lets say someone watches a violent movie and then goes and shoots a bunch of people. did the movie makers have an effect on that persons violence? certainly because you obviously cant say that a violent movie doesnt have SOME kind of effect on people. but it probably doesnt mean were not gonna have violent movies. question would be if were gonna have violent movies, HOW are we gonna have violent movies? so we plan for this by a rating system, we try and teach people not to be violent, etc. guns are dangerous too. question do you plan enough or not enough for the negative consequences of gun, or car, or violent movies. back i dunno before the 1970s cars were made for style not safety, and the automakers knew this and covered it up because they wanted to push style. so automakers said if you get in an accident, its the drivers fault not theirs, which was bull:censored:. so hood ornaments impaled people, steering columns hurt people, etc. so they got regulated more and cars are safer. doesnt mean regulations are always good, or always bad. it can be either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Election 2016
Top