Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Election Misconduct charges filed against UPSF in KC election
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cole" data-source="post: 232465" data-attributes="member: 9507"><p>My friend no spin, if the results were closer it would make more sense, but the fact that it was such a huge margin tells me it would be a waste of resources to try them again, even if it was done by partially illegal means. I would suggest moving on to the next one and go after even harder and make known to the next group what to expect and to let you know if any such activity takes place. You have to "know when to hold e'm, know when to fold e'm, know when to walk away, know when to run". </p><p> </p><p>Rejection is tough, but twice would be worse.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cole, post: 232465, member: 9507"] My friend no spin, if the results were closer it would make more sense, but the fact that it was such a huge margin tells me it would be a waste of resources to try them again, even if it was done by partially illegal means. I would suggest moving on to the next one and go after even harder and make known to the next group what to expect and to let you know if any such activity takes place. You have to "know when to hold e'm, know when to fold e'm, know when to walk away, know when to run". Rejection is tough, but twice would be worse. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Election Misconduct charges filed against UPSF in KC election
Top