Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 4931341" data-attributes="member: 68849">I understand that.I understand exactly why the constitution was ammended and for what purpose.It dealt with slaves.We have a dilemma however.A person born to an illegal entrant, whose parent(s) citizenship is of another nation is under the jurisdiction of their&nbsp; nation, via citizenship. Their legal residence is where they came from until they can satisfy the requirements for legal residence where they land.For infractions of law, criminal or civil they are under the jurisdiction of the county or state where the offense was committed, be it criminal or tort, not where they hang their hat.I knew I would have the 14th Amendment offered to me.Precisely the reason I said offer no legal documentation for any illegal immigrant.I have to admit I do stand on the literal wording of the Constitution.In light of that, I despise those that subvert laws to their benefit and then use the Constitution to support their position.It&#039;s a Cloward-Piven strategy the left is known for.You fight with what you&#039;ve got.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 4931341, member: 68849"] I understand that. I understand exactly why the constitution was ammended and for what purpose. It dealt with slaves. We have a dilemma however. A person born to an illegal entrant, whose parent(s) citizenship is of another nation is under the jurisdiction of their nation, via citizenship. Their legal residence is where they came from until they can satisfy the requirements for legal residence where they land. For infractions of law, criminal or civil they are under the jurisdiction of the county or state where the offense was committed, be it criminal or tort, not where they hang their hat. I knew I would have the 14th Amendment offered to me. Precisely the reason I said offer no legal documentation for any illegal immigrant. I have to admit I do stand on the literal wording of the Constitution. In light of that, I despise those that subvert laws to their benefit and then use the Constitution to support their position. It's a Cloward-Piven strategy the left is known for. You fight with what you've got. [/QUOTE]

Verification