Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH PEOPLE!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="959Nanook" data-source="post: 1375374" data-attributes="member: 14462"><p>Just curious, did your Local have a Health and Welfare Fund ready and willing to accept you? Jurisdictions that failed to pass their Riders and Supplements were allowed to opt out of TeamCare if they had an alternative H&W willing and able to accept them or were able to establish a H&W alternative (yes, it had to be deemed equivalent or better). More importantly, were you forced out of your Local's H&W as you suggest that brothers and sisters from Local 348 should have been when you use them as the example of the exception to the rule? </p><p></p><p>I understand the overall concern that you are voicing in this thread and I appreciate your specific factual input about how your health care has changed; however, I think you muddy the waters if you raise Local 348 and it turns out that your Jurisdiction was unable or unwilling to provide an alternative to TeamCare.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="959Nanook, post: 1375374, member: 14462"] Just curious, did your Local have a Health and Welfare Fund ready and willing to accept you? Jurisdictions that failed to pass their Riders and Supplements were allowed to opt out of TeamCare if they had an alternative H&W willing and able to accept them or were able to establish a H&W alternative (yes, it had to be deemed equivalent or better). More importantly, were you forced out of your Local's H&W as you suggest that brothers and sisters from Local 348 should have been when you use them as the example of the exception to the rule? I understand the overall concern that you are voicing in this thread and I appreciate your specific factual input about how your health care has changed; however, I think you muddy the waters if you raise Local 348 and it turns out that your Jurisdiction was unable or unwilling to provide an alternative to TeamCare. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH PEOPLE!!!
Top