Epstein's List

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
It seems to me when Trump figured out exactly what he was about. He kicked him to the curb.
“Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything,

Donald: Yes, there is, but I won’t tell you what it is.

Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.

Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.

Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.

Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?

Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.

Donald: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
“Voice Over: There must be more to life than having everything,

Donald: Yes, there is, but I won’t tell you what it is.

Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.

Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.

Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.

Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?

Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.

Donald: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”
Lol, I don’t even know what that means or what that proves or if it’s true. Interesting it’s just to come out recently. 🤷‍♂️

But as usual your side will push for the most harmful and disgusting thing that you think Trump might’ve done.

My stance is quite different. I’m saying I don’t think he did any of those things himself, somebody would’ve already exposed him but if he’s covering for the people who did he’s no better even if he thinks it’s for national security or some “greater good” nonsense

And food for thought, if he did do those things that means others and leaders have covered for him making them no better.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
Lol, I don’t even know what that means or what that proves or if it’s true. Interesting it’s just to come out recently. 🤷‍♂️

But as usual your side will push for the most harmful and disgusting thing that you think Trump might’ve done.

My stance is quite different. I’m saying I don’t think he did any of those things himself, somebody would’ve already exposed him but if he’s covering for the people who did he’s no better even if he thinks it’s for national security or some “greater good” nonsense

And food for thought, if he did do those things that means others and leaders have covered for him making them no better.
Release all the files with the victims identities protected. Right?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I don’t know. Bondi told us previously they were sitting on her desk. Strange.
I wonder whose desk they were sitting on the previous four years? It is strange.


Do you believe it is at all possible that the government is more concerned with the self preservation of their power and the two party system, Then truth, justice, and the American way?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Trump can change that today. You think he will?
Interestingly, enough, I don’t believe anything would change.

We currently have a pretty big scandal brewing with Russia gate and the Obama administration.

The left will discount it because the right is the one who’s doing the investigation.


Truth is now subjective to whoever is in charge.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Nothing would change if Trump instructed that all Epstein materials in possession of the government be released to the public?
Of course not. You sat idly by and listen to every lie of the last administration,used and even when it became apparent,, it was a lie you made excuses. You would do the same for your side if this was released.

You have no desire for truth. You have only one desire, and that is political retribution. That is why you’re misguided.

It is not ex exclusive to you and your side by the way.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
Of course not. You sat idly by and listen to every lie of the last administration,used and even when it became apparent,, it was a lie you made excuses. You would do the same for your side if this was released.

You have no desire for truth. You have only one desire, and that is political retribution. That is why you’re misguided.

It is not ex exclusive to you and your side by the way.
Ok.

Would you be in favor of releasing all files related to Jeffrey Epstein to the public with only the victims' identities redacted?

Yes or no.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Ok.

Would you be in favor of releasing all files related to Jeffrey Epstein to the public with only the victims' identities redacted?

Yes or no.
A Habitually, dishonest and hateful person such yourself has no business asking me and demanding a yes or no question. You have no morals and no moral high ground.

You can go back and read my previous comments to know. I’m consistent.
 

Next Day Err

Well-Known Member
Of course you could take whatever you want and twist it because that’s what you do that’s why I told you that you’re habitually dishonest.
Ok, I'll change your answer to my question to a "yes".

The government should release all materials related to Jeffrey Epstein, including all FD-302s, pictures, video, etc.

Right?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
AG Bondi said there were. Before the election Trump himself said he would be in favor of releasing information on Epstein that the government had in its possession.

Should we have believed them then or should we believe them now?
Oh, that changed. There’s nothing there nothing to see here move alone stop being dumb and helping the Democrats.

It’s fun how the Democrats not releasing it when they had a chance gives some Creedence to what Trump is saying. Almost like they’re passing the baton to each other. Plausible deniability.
 
Top