Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Doublestandards" data-source="post: 6166968" data-attributes="member: 110123">I’ve thought about that point as well, but I have a few counter arguments 1. Biden administration was more of a standard establishment politician. He’s in there with the rest of them. Not in the Epstein files necessarily, maybe he is, no evidence yet (I could see Hunter although maybe lol) but he’s certainly rubbing hands and part of the group that is in there. If the establishment doesn’t want that list getting released, it’s not going to get released under Biden. I imagine he’s close with the Clinton’s 2. I don’t think files of this magnitude under the fbi are leakable. Biden maybe could have, if he really wanted to, but I don’t think he did, or cared. Biden is an establishment guy, but he was also barely hanging on and was stumbling around for a few hours a day. I don’t think his main priority was getting to the fbi files and releasing parts of them to leak that Trump was in the list, something his base would surely call fake news anyways coming from him 3. I don’t believe fbi files of this magnitude are leakable from lower level of staffers. I just don’t think the fbi plays around with this level of classification where it can just get leaked 4. By saying “if Trump was on the list it would have been leaked” would be the same as me saying “if Clinton was on that list Trump would have released it”. No one believes that. No one would be shocked if Clinton is on that listAnd if we’re going by that logic, “if so and so was on that list, then so and so would have released it”. Well then we go back to both sides, and the only conclusion to that logic is that since no one released it, no one on the other side of the political aisle is on the list, so there must be no listBut none of us believe that. There are people on both sides of the aisle on that list</blockquote>

Verification