Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Ethics and personal responsibilty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dilligaf" data-source="post: 366116" data-attributes="member: 11476"><p>Daniel, I never expected this to turn out the way it has. It has been a great thread and your initial post started it all. Well kinda.</p><p> </p><p>This thread has run the gambit of personal responsibility, to company ethics and responsibility and morals. Everything from tats and personal appearance has been covered. </p><p> </p><p>Now lets change it up a little. I Pm'd Daniel. After having had a really bad week I needed some input. I was pulled into the office for going over 9.5 on Monday. DM said he needed to 'micro-manage' my time. His words not mine. That was just one of the things that happened, and they sure as hell don't worry about me going over on thurs and fri. That happens 90% of the time. On thurs they broke out my bidded rte and forced me over 9.5. I had an 8 hr request for thurs, which was conviently lost. I didn't clock out until 9pm. </p><p> </p><p>I asked Daniel how he did it for 33 yrs. I had lost focus last week (and actually for much longer than just last week). So I asked him for some guidance. Basically his responce was 'one day at a time'. Now it's everyone elses turn. Tie made a statement and it's obvious that he is going to ignore my request to clarify his statement. Since Tie is not going to respond, does anyone have any idea where he was going with his statement?</p><p> </p><p><em><span style="color: blue">"I'll keep my argument simple for now. Some people do a terrific job of gaining good treatment. Others seem to make theirselves victims all the time. Why is that? What makes one different from the other."</span></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>IMHO, I don't think his argument holds any water. I think he was speaking of violating the contract to gain preferential treatment. I choose not to do this. I have a contract and I hold the company accountable to that contract. Tie, you seem to post more in Labor Relations than in Discussions. Since you seem to know so much about the contract then you will be familiar with Art. 37 Sect 1a.</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dilligaf, post: 366116, member: 11476"] Daniel, I never expected this to turn out the way it has. It has been a great thread and your initial post started it all. Well kinda. This thread has run the gambit of personal responsibility, to company ethics and responsibility and morals. Everything from tats and personal appearance has been covered. Now lets change it up a little. I Pm'd Daniel. After having had a really bad week I needed some input. I was pulled into the office for going over 9.5 on Monday. DM said he needed to 'micro-manage' my time. His words not mine. That was just one of the things that happened, and they sure as hell don't worry about me going over on thurs and fri. That happens 90% of the time. On thurs they broke out my bidded rte and forced me over 9.5. I had an 8 hr request for thurs, which was conviently lost. I didn't clock out until 9pm. I asked Daniel how he did it for 33 yrs. I had lost focus last week (and actually for much longer than just last week). So I asked him for some guidance. Basically his responce was 'one day at a time'. Now it's everyone elses turn. Tie made a statement and it's obvious that he is going to ignore my request to clarify his statement. Since Tie is not going to respond, does anyone have any idea where he was going with his statement? [I][COLOR=blue]"I'll keep my argument simple for now. Some people do a terrific job of gaining good treatment. Others seem to make theirselves victims all the time. Why is that? What makes one different from the other."[/COLOR] [/I] [I]IMHO, I don't think his argument holds any water. I think he was speaking of violating the contract to gain preferential treatment. I choose not to do this. I have a contract and I hold the company accountable to that contract. Tie, you seem to post more in Labor Relations than in Discussions. Since you seem to know so much about the contract then you will be familiar with Art. 37 Sect 1a.[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Ethics and personal responsibilty
Top