Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 5056318" data-attributes="member: 44954">Because that was a case of a local health department requiring the equivalent of $150 to not get a vaccine. Courts have repeatedly said the authority to issue health directives lies with localities, not the federal government.Democrats know this, which is why they&#039;re using OSHA through a rarely used workaround called an emergency temporary standard. It has only been used 10 times in history, and half of those were struck down by the courts.I would also suggest you look into the Chevron Deference Doctrine, which the court has recently ruled against quite a bit.&nbsp; Frankly, all of this could backfire and the radical overeach of the federal government through a massive admistrative bureaucracy might get a big smack down from the court.But the radical left wingers at politico told you &#039;Hurr Durr smallpox&#039;, so you&#039;ve got it all figured out.&nbsp; SMH.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 5056318, member: 44954"] Because that was a case of a local health department requiring the equivalent of $150 to not get a vaccine. Courts have repeatedly said the authority to issue health directives lies with localities, not the federal government. Democrats know this, which is why they're using OSHA through a rarely used workaround called an emergency temporary standard. It has only been used 10 times in history, and half of those were struck down by the courts. I would also suggest you look into the Chevron Deference Doctrine, which the court has recently ruled against quite a bit. Frankly, all of this could backfire and the radical overeach of the federal government through a massive admistrative bureaucracy might get a big smack down from the court. But the radical left wingers at politico told you 'Hurr Durr smallpox', so you've got it all figured out. SMH. [/QUOTE]

Verification