Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
FBI & CIA Editing at Wikipedia
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 232656" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Satellitedriver,</p><p> </p><p>I know D thought the motive may be something else but it was more a matter of humor, thus the winking face. Clinton got blame after he left office and it goes as you said. I know even at UPS when someone leaves, especially if they leave the company or retire that early on if something happens, the blame is thrown at them if it can stick because they aren't there to defend themselves and they make an excellent scapegoat. </p><p> </p><p>All past presidents Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, etc. etc. have been blamed during and especially after leaving office of causing one ill or another. After they leave historians pour over the details even more with microscopes and people talk and write of direct events and then the Monday morning quarterbacking begins. I think it's good to do this because how do you learn what works and what doesn't unless you look at the history (results) of your actions?</p><p> </p><p>It's just always easier to focus on the negative than the positive because of human nature and as such that's what we tend to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 232656, member: 2189"] Satellitedriver, I know D thought the motive may be something else but it was more a matter of humor, thus the winking face. Clinton got blame after he left office and it goes as you said. I know even at UPS when someone leaves, especially if they leave the company or retire that early on if something happens, the blame is thrown at them if it can stick because they aren't there to defend themselves and they make an excellent scapegoat. All past presidents Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, etc. etc. have been blamed during and especially after leaving office of causing one ill or another. After they leave historians pour over the details even more with microscopes and people talk and write of direct events and then the Monday morning quarterbacking begins. I think it's good to do this because how do you learn what works and what doesn't unless you look at the history (results) of your actions? It's just always easier to focus on the negative than the positive because of human nature and as such that's what we tend to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
FBI & CIA Editing at Wikipedia
Top