Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 5386995" data-attributes="member: 68849">No one killed a wife here. (As much as Bill might wish she were.)Weren&#039;t you the same clowns yelling precedent before and after the Dobbs opinion?The difference we have here is the Supreme Court issued an opinion supporting their decision to overthrow precedent.Comey offered his opinion and obviously Attorney General Lynch&nbsp; agreed and complied with his statement.A difference in this situation is the President is the final authority of what is or is not classified material and you clowns seek to prosecute a crime that isn&#039;t.&nbsp; Comey said in Clinton&#039;s case,“Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,”to a crime that was.Can you conclude this is the prelude to an unreasonable prosecution?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 5386995, member: 68849"] No one killed a wife here. (As much as Bill might wish she were.) Weren't you the same clowns yelling precedent before and after the Dobbs opinion? The difference we have here is the Supreme Court issued an opinion supporting their decision to overthrow precedent. Comey offered his opinion and obviously Attorney General Lynch agreed and complied with his statement. A difference in this situation is the President is [B]the final authority of what is or is not classified material[/B] and you clowns seek to prosecute a crime that isn't. Comey said in Clinton's case, [B]“Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case,”[/B] to a crime that was. Can you conclude this is the prelude to an unreasonable prosecution? [/QUOTE]

Verification