Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
FedEx Home wins round in Unionization efforts
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tornup" data-source="post: 533905" data-attributes="member: 22874"><p>It is null and void because you want the right to control everything and yes you do not want to pay taxes or have an employee because this will cost you. You want the best of both worlds. Its abusing the system.</p><p>I do not understand why you want to bring in a whole different situation altogether. Fedex Independent contractors buy their routes for thousands of dollars. They are paying for everything under the sun. If they were an employee, then fedex would have the right to tell me when to * or get off the pot. But when a persons health is at stake and fedex is controlling their every move. This is wrong. When they send people to ride with you and people to harrass you, this is CONTROL. Obviously this is what fedex has been trying to get away with for so many years. Put the expense off on the little guy-call them independent contractors and still walk around demanding orders like they are employees, while they rake in millions.</p><p>Yes, I know why not? If you can get away with it. Why not? The contract is as thick as a book too and how many codes do you think people understand in that contract? Fedex purposely makes the contract confusing. They don't want you to understand it. And as far as you telling your people how you want things done. Thats fine if you laid that all out on the table from the start. But when the rules change later on down the road. That is when the fire starts getting too hot to handle. Employees have to abide by the boss. A Fedex Independent Contractor is the Boss.</p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/peaceful.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":peaceful:" title="Peaceful :peaceful:" data-shortname=":peaceful:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tornup, post: 533905, member: 22874"] It is null and void because you want the right to control everything and yes you do not want to pay taxes or have an employee because this will cost you. You want the best of both worlds. Its abusing the system. I do not understand why you want to bring in a whole different situation altogether. Fedex Independent contractors buy their routes for thousands of dollars. They are paying for everything under the sun. If they were an employee, then fedex would have the right to tell me when to * or get off the pot. But when a persons health is at stake and fedex is controlling their every move. This is wrong. When they send people to ride with you and people to harrass you, this is CONTROL. Obviously this is what fedex has been trying to get away with for so many years. Put the expense off on the little guy-call them independent contractors and still walk around demanding orders like they are employees, while they rake in millions. Yes, I know why not? If you can get away with it. Why not? The contract is as thick as a book too and how many codes do you think people understand in that contract? Fedex purposely makes the contract confusing. They don't want you to understand it. And as far as you telling your people how you want things done. Thats fine if you laid that all out on the table from the start. But when the rules change later on down the road. That is when the fire starts getting too hot to handle. Employees have to abide by the boss. A Fedex Independent Contractor is the Boss. :peaceful: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
FedEx Home wins round in Unionization efforts
Top