For Full-Time Employees: Temporary Part-Time Scheduling

[ThePackageDeli]

As part of a newness initiative, we would like our new CEO to implement flexible scheduling options for full-time employees.

These options would include but not be limited to:

- 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month contract agreements for reduced hours of service.

Under the agreement, employees will choose the number of days per week they would like to work and the set days of the week. The employee agrees to not miss any work days for the duration of the contract.

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

As part of a newness initiative, we would like our new CEO to implement flexible scheduling options for full-time employees.

These options would include but not be limited to:

- 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month contract agreements for reduced hours of service.

Under the agreement, employees will choose the number of days per week they would like to work and the set days of the week. The employee agrees to not miss any work days for the duration of the contract.

I don’t see the point. Too many of our current full timers (mostly in the millennial age range) are already working part time hours and selecting their own days as they call out despite already being under an agreement (current contract) that requires that they not miss any work days.

Full-time is 40 hours or more per week. If someone wants to be part time then perhaps they should not have signed up for a full-time job?

What would make more sense is for a national push for a new language that allows some full timers to go back to part time. But I seriously doubt that will happen seeing how we couldn’t get the majority of our employees to vote last time despite it being easier than ever. People will spend hours staring at their phone looking at Facebook, Instagram, and their various fantasy football leagues. But couldn’t be bothered to take one minute to vote on a contract.

 

[Jones]

Under the agreement, employees will choose the number of days per week they would like to work and the set days of the week. The employee agrees to not miss any work days for the duration of the contract.

haha..

 

[ThePackageDeli]

I don’t see the point. Too many of our current full timers (mostly in the millennial age range) are already working part time hours and selecting their own days as they call out despite already being under an agreement (current contract) that requires that they not miss any work days.

Full-time is 40 hours or more per week. If someone wants to be part time then perhaps they should not have signed up for a full-time job?

What would make more sense is for a national push for a new language that allows some full timers to go back to part time. But I seriously doubt that will happen seeing how we couldn’t get the majority of our employees to vote last time despite it being easier than ever. People will spend hours staring at their phone looking at Facebook, Instagram, and their various fantasy football leagues. But couldn’t be bothered to take one minute to vote on a contract.

We're in a new era where flexibility is more fashionable than the hard nosed set in stone work scheduling of the past. Technological innovation is allowing for a more dynamic work environment..
If employees are already acting out the agreement that I've proposed, then we should take it as a sign and make it official so that management and scheduling can know for sure when people will be missing work instead of playing the guessing game like they are now.

 

[What'dyabringmetoday???]

I don’t see the point. Too many of our current full timers (mostly in the millennial age range) are already working part time hours and selecting their own days as they call out despite already being under an agreement (current contract) that requires that they not miss any work days.

Full-time is 40 hours or more per week. If someone wants to be part time then perhaps they should not have signed up for a full-time job?

What would make more sense is for a national push for a new language that allows some full timers to go back to part time. But I seriously doubt that will happen seeing how we couldn’t get the majority of our employees to vote last time despite it being easier than ever. People will spend hours staring at their phone looking at Facebook, Instagram, and their various fantasy football leagues. But couldn’t be bothered to take one minute to vote on a contract.

Maybe they voted but their ballots mysteriously "disappeared ". Lol.

 

[BigUnionGuy]

Maybe they voted but their ballots mysteriously "disappeared ". Lol.

Tell the truth.

You wear your safety vest, walking into work.




You're scared of the company.



-Bug-

 

[Overpaid Union Thug]

We're in a new era where flexibility is more fashionable than the hard nosed set in stone work scheduling of the past. Technological innovation is allowing for a more dynamic work environment..
If employees are already acting out the agreement that I've proposed, then we should take it as a sign and make it official so that management and scheduling can know for sure when people will be missing work instead of playing the guessing game like they are now.

Yeah because a company is going to want to pay full time benefits for additional part time employees. LOL LOL LOL LOL

 

[Jones]

This sounds like a job for Denis T!

 

[Yolo]

We can apply for a leave of absence. Just do that.

 

[Yolo]

Or tell your doctor you get headaches to get on FMLA. That's what all the slackers here do..

 

[Just A UPS Guy]

As part of a newness initiative, we would like our new CEO to implement flexible scheduling options for full-time employees.

These options would include but not be limited to:

- 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month contract agreements for reduced hours of service.

Under the agreement, employees will choose the number of days per week they would like to work and the set days of the week. The employee agrees to not miss any work days for the duration of the contract.

Uningbelievable.

 

[ThePackageDeli]

Yeah because a company is going to want to pay full time benefits for additional part time employees. LOL LOL LOL LOL

Yeah because a company is going to want to pay full time benefits for additional part time employees. LOL LOL LOL LOL

Some upsides for the company could be:
- part-timer benefits assigned to drivers under the agreement
- reduction in injuries
- reduction in unscheduled call-ins
- improved productivity from well-rested employees

If something like this would ever be seriously considered, I feel like it could be a good thing for everyone.

 

[What'dyabringmetoday???]

Tell the truth.

You wear your safety vest, walking into work.




You're scared of the company.



-Bug-

Yup- real scared. Even more scared....of "elected leaders". Especially if I am standing between them and a box of doughnuts. You really do have a high regard for yourself....

 

[burrheadd]

As part of a newness initiative, we would like our new CEO to implement flexible scheduling options for full-time employees.

These options would include but not be limited to:

- 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month contract agreements for reduced hours of service.

Under the agreement, employees will choose the number of days per week they would like to work and the set days of the week. The employee agrees to not miss any work days for the duration of the contract.

Lol

 

[ThePackageDeli]

SPREAD THE WORD!

 

[Richard Harrow]

Bring your concerns to union leadership when the time to negotiate the next contract comes.

 

[Jones]

I hear Dennis T has a plan.

 

[Poop Head]

SPREAD THE WORD!

View attachment 299180

What kinda drugs do you do?

 

[542thruNthru]

SPREAD THE WORD!

View attachment 299180

And how would this "flexible" schedule work?

By seniority?

 

[UnionGuy]

I want more hours. I don't have a family of my own so I have enough time to spend at work.