Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fred Z to endorse the L-396 Richard G Slate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1396592" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>To some point I agree with you.</p><p></p><p>There are other issues to consider when talking about running a local office. G has no executive officer experience running a local, so it stands to reason that he will have to rely on "OUTSIDERS" to control the local.</p><p></p><p>Having "outsiders" controlling the local brings about its own problems. TDU for one.</p><p></p><p>TDU has NEVER been popular here in so cal, and in 396 TDU carries with it a bad name. </p><p></p><p>G and TDU as a mix will alienate most 396 upsers and Ron will get those votes despite being hated for his role in this latest contract.</p><p></p><p>It doesnt take "balls" to run against H, it takes experience. Experience to know when and when not to run against an encumbent.</p><p></p><p>Its clear, that Galvans motivations for self gain outweighs his motivations to help the local members.</p><p></p><p>If the members were his key issue, then why focus only on outsiders to help him with this election?</p><p></p><p>Bringing in Fred Z, isnt a help for him.. Well i applaud Fred for his efforts at his local, and for his courage to stand up against the current hierarchy at the International, his efforts went most unnoticed here in local 396.</p><p></p><p>Members are just not that "engaged" to give a crap. So, Fred endorsing carries no weight with our members.</p><p></p><p>Members dont forget, and Galvans "adventure in las vegas" didnt stay in vegas, and the membership knows this alltowell.</p><p></p><p>I dont agree with H and Phillips, and I "personally" called them out to their faces, in my yard during the contract negotiations, and the both of them filed "Harrassment" charges on me with UPS.</p><p></p><p>Those charges were dismissed just as quickly as the both of them ran into HR with their tails between their legs.</p><p></p><p>G knows there was a better plan for this election, but his ego wont allow the members to have a slate that they could support without having to re elect H.</p><p></p><p>Let me be clear, G is a nice person, he has ideas, but he is the wrong person for the job.</p><p></p><p>TOS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1396592, member: 17969"] To some point I agree with you. There are other issues to consider when talking about running a local office. G has no executive officer experience running a local, so it stands to reason that he will have to rely on "OUTSIDERS" to control the local. Having "outsiders" controlling the local brings about its own problems. TDU for one. TDU has NEVER been popular here in so cal, and in 396 TDU carries with it a bad name. G and TDU as a mix will alienate most 396 upsers and Ron will get those votes despite being hated for his role in this latest contract. It doesnt take "balls" to run against H, it takes experience. Experience to know when and when not to run against an encumbent. Its clear, that Galvans motivations for self gain outweighs his motivations to help the local members. If the members were his key issue, then why focus only on outsiders to help him with this election? Bringing in Fred Z, isnt a help for him.. Well i applaud Fred for his efforts at his local, and for his courage to stand up against the current hierarchy at the International, his efforts went most unnoticed here in local 396. Members are just not that "engaged" to give a crap. So, Fred endorsing carries no weight with our members. Members dont forget, and Galvans "adventure in las vegas" didnt stay in vegas, and the membership knows this alltowell. I dont agree with H and Phillips, and I "personally" called them out to their faces, in my yard during the contract negotiations, and the both of them filed "Harrassment" charges on me with UPS. Those charges were dismissed just as quickly as the both of them ran into HR with their tails between their legs. G knows there was a better plan for this election, but his ego wont allow the members to have a slate that they could support without having to re elect H. Let me be clear, G is a nice person, he has ideas, but he is the wrong person for the job. TOS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fred Z to endorse the L-396 Richard G Slate
Top