Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fred Z to endorse the L-396 Richard G Slate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 1407274" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>That isnt a political lesson at all. You have your facts sorta backwards.</p><p></p><p>First, like I said, standing in the street shaking your first isnt going to change washington. They will do whatever they want to do despite the peoples complaints.</p><p></p><p>This is the new reality for america and the by product of Citizens United, something the GOP wanted to keep it that way.</p><p></p><p>In fact, just last week, the GOP blocked a bill that would have effectively killed Citizens United because the democrats wouldnt include a "rider" to kill the affordable care act.</p><p></p><p>As for the trade deal, you dont possibly think this was President Obamas creation, right? I mean, an expert like you, all so knowledgeable about trade deals made with the WTO couldnt possibly blame Obama for this, right?</p><p></p><p>Hopefully, you understand that this trade deal was started, negotiated and promoted by George W. Bush, and President Obama RE NEGOTIATED the agreement before signing it to attempt to protect american workers.</p><p></p><p>Of course, not that you would know, now that i understand you suffer from "NOLUCK" syndrome style of posting stuff you dont understand and then believing you have it all figured out.</p><p></p><p>Quote:</p><p></p><p>"The agreements, negotiated by President George W. Bush, were revised by the Obama administration to include new terms for auto tariffs from South Korea, a tax-information exchange with Panama and labor-rights assurances from Colombia.</p><p></p><p>The South Korea deal is the biggest for the U.S. since the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. It will boost U.S. exports as much as $10.9 billion in the first year that it’s in full effect, according to the U.S. International Trade Commission. The accord with Colombia is expected to increase exports as much as $1.1 billion a year. "</p><p></p><p>Maybe, instead of playing basement politician, you could actually learn to research something before you post about it.</p><p></p><p>Congressional approval</p><p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/oct/13/us-free-trade-agreements-korea" target="_blank">US Congress backs free trade pacts with South Korea, Colombia and Panama</a></p><p></p><p>BUSH creation</p><p><a href="http://jacksonville.com/apnews/stories/101207/D8S7SPAG0.shtml" target="_blank">http://jacksonville.com/apnews/stories/101207/D8S7SPAG0.shtml</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Trade deficits under Obama after trade deal was re negotiated.</p><p><a href="http://ndn.org/blog/2014/02/under-obama-trade-deficits-way-down" target="_blank">Under Obama, Trade Deficits Way Down</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have it all wrong bub. But then again, I already know.</p><p></p><p>TOS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 1407274, member: 17969"] That isnt a political lesson at all. You have your facts sorta backwards. First, like I said, standing in the street shaking your first isnt going to change washington. They will do whatever they want to do despite the peoples complaints. This is the new reality for america and the by product of Citizens United, something the GOP wanted to keep it that way. In fact, just last week, the GOP blocked a bill that would have effectively killed Citizens United because the democrats wouldnt include a "rider" to kill the affordable care act. As for the trade deal, you dont possibly think this was President Obamas creation, right? I mean, an expert like you, all so knowledgeable about trade deals made with the WTO couldnt possibly blame Obama for this, right? Hopefully, you understand that this trade deal was started, negotiated and promoted by George W. Bush, and President Obama RE NEGOTIATED the agreement before signing it to attempt to protect american workers. Of course, not that you would know, now that i understand you suffer from "NOLUCK" syndrome style of posting stuff you dont understand and then believing you have it all figured out. Quote: "The agreements, negotiated by President George W. Bush, were revised by the Obama administration to include new terms for auto tariffs from South Korea, a tax-information exchange with Panama and labor-rights assurances from Colombia. The South Korea deal is the biggest for the U.S. since the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994. It will boost U.S. exports as much as $10.9 billion in the first year that it’s in full effect, according to the U.S. International Trade Commission. The accord with Colombia is expected to increase exports as much as $1.1 billion a year. " Maybe, instead of playing basement politician, you could actually learn to research something before you post about it. Congressional approval [URL="http://www.theguardian.com/business/2011/oct/13/us-free-trade-agreements-korea"]US Congress backs free trade pacts with South Korea, Colombia and Panama[/URL] BUSH creation [URL]http://jacksonville.com/apnews/stories/101207/D8S7SPAG0.shtml[/URL] Trade deficits under Obama after trade deal was re negotiated. [URL="http://ndn.org/blog/2014/02/under-obama-trade-deficits-way-down"]Under Obama, Trade Deficits Way Down[/URL] You have it all wrong bub. But then again, I already know. TOS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Fred Z to endorse the L-396 Richard G Slate
Top