Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Full-Time Supervisors Excluded From SRP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 667880" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>I see a huge difference in this one vs. the previous two. I could be wrong, but this is what I see.</p><p> </p><p>Before, the buyouts offers basically said that if you choose to not take it, you still have a job. They implied you would need to work harder, but the expectation was that a job loss was not iminent.</p><p> </p><p>This time, the message seems to be if the offer is not taken, the is no assurance of a job, and that forced seperation will be happening.</p><p> </p><p>This time, they have said that jobs will be lost. This time, an individual may have to look around and see if they are one of the 1800 poorest performers. If so, the buyout is better than the alternative.</p><p> </p><p>I do not know this for a fact, but the signs point that way. I believe the poorer performers will be let go as compared to what happened previously. Before, the best performers took the buyour because they had alternatives.</p><p> </p><p>We shall see.</p><p> </p><p>P-Man</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 667880, member: 927"] I see a huge difference in this one vs. the previous two. I could be wrong, but this is what I see. Before, the buyouts offers basically said that if you choose to not take it, you still have a job. They implied you would need to work harder, but the expectation was that a job loss was not iminent. This time, the message seems to be if the offer is not taken, the is no assurance of a job, and that forced seperation will be happening. This time, they have said that jobs will be lost. This time, an individual may have to look around and see if they are one of the 1800 poorest performers. If so, the buyout is better than the alternative. I do not know this for a fact, but the signs point that way. I believe the poorer performers will be let go as compared to what happened previously. Before, the best performers took the buyour because they had alternatives. We shall see. P-Man [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
Full-Time Supervisors Excluded From SRP
Top