Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Future for Article 22.3 jobs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gandydancer" data-source="post: 439114" data-attributes="member: 9310"><p>Not an issue. If you shut a building [an]other more-or-less local building or buildings would have to service the pickups and deliveries, and no one would question that a job was "maintained" as long as it followed the work. And if the company wanted to start laying off 22.3's AFTER laying off all the part-timers with less company senioriity I certainly wouldn't question reopening the contract to eliminate the guarantee. But that's a purely theoretical possibility which bears no resemblance to what is happening in JC28, and maybe elsewhere. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>No, that's bassackwards. We don't need restrictions on the company's "right" to eliminate 22.3 jobs and recreate the same number in some other state. The plain meaning of the contract says they can't do that. It's the company that needs to prove to an arbitrator that the union negotiators agreed to something different than what they put before the membership. Unless hall rolls over to prevent the company from showing exactly that, or because he's otherwise sold out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gandydancer, post: 439114, member: 9310"] Not an issue. If you shut a building [an]other more-or-less local building or buildings would have to service the pickups and deliveries, and no one would question that a job was "maintained" as long as it followed the work. And if the company wanted to start laying off 22.3's AFTER laying off all the part-timers with less company senioriity I certainly wouldn't question reopening the contract to eliminate the guarantee. But that's a purely theoretical possibility which bears no resemblance to what is happening in JC28, and maybe elsewhere. No, that's bassackwards. We don't need restrictions on the company's "right" to eliminate 22.3 jobs and recreate the same number in some other state. The plain meaning of the contract says they can't do that. It's the company that needs to prove to an arbitrator that the union negotiators agreed to something different than what they put before the membership. Unless hall rolls over to prevent the company from showing exactly that, or because he's otherwise sold out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Future for Article 22.3 jobs?
Top