Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Future for Article 22.3 jobs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dark_Team_135" data-source="post: 442372" data-attributes="member: 17242"><p>As you already wrote the opening paragraph states that there will be 20,000 permanent jobs openings filled <strong>throughout its operations</strong>. They are just talking about through attrition since that language has been in the contract for many years. </p><p> </p><p>In YOUR opinion the language that follows compels the company to keep the previously created combo jobs in the exact location where they were originally created. As I have stated before, because the contract doesn't specifically state that the company has to do this, it will likely be an arbitrator's opinion that will decide who is right on this. </p><p> </p><p>If I have time, I will find some decisions where the language seemed on the surface to be perfectly clear (much more than this language) but were ultimately found by an arbitrator to be not so clear...</p><p> </p><p>Again, I hope you are right, but it isn't as cut-and-dry as you seem to believe. If it were, the company wouldn't be doing it already. Remember, they have many lawyers on the payroll that I am sure have looked at this language already. </p><p> </p><p>Did you do what I asked you to and have your Local's B.A. contact the IBT to get their opinion on the subject to see if it has changed?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dark_Team_135, post: 442372, member: 17242"] As you already wrote the opening paragraph states that there will be 20,000 permanent jobs openings filled [B]throughout its operations[/B]. They are just talking about through attrition since that language has been in the contract for many years. In YOUR opinion the language that follows compels the company to keep the previously created combo jobs in the exact location where they were originally created. As I have stated before, because the contract doesn't specifically state that the company has to do this, it will likely be an arbitrator's opinion that will decide who is right on this. If I have time, I will find some decisions where the language seemed on the surface to be perfectly clear (much more than this language) but were ultimately found by an arbitrator to be not so clear... Again, I hope you are right, but it isn't as cut-and-dry as you seem to believe. If it were, the company wouldn't be doing it already. Remember, they have many lawyers on the payroll that I am sure have looked at this language already. Did you do what I asked you to and have your Local's B.A. contact the IBT to get their opinion on the subject to see if it has changed? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Future for Article 22.3 jobs?
Top