Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
getting paid for supervisors working?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PobreCarlos" data-source="post: 622858" data-attributes="member: 16651"><p>705red;</p><p> </p><p>What "equals job loss in the long run" is union intransigence. Or do you think that the Teamsters lost 75% of the jobs they once held in their core industry because they "let supervisors work"? Get real!</p><p> </p><p>In truth, it's pricks that nickel 'n' dime every little management action that cause effective businesses to avoid Teamsters like the plague...and with good reason; the Teamster cause the companies they organize to go out of business ("Oh no! That's not right! After all, Central States is thriving!...grin!). And, obviously (although the point seems to escape most Teamsters!) when the businesses go, the jobs they provided go with 'em.</p><p> </p><p>One would think after the number of jobs the Teamsters (such as yourself) have pissed away in that fashion over the last few decades, that they would have learned by now. But apparently they haven't.</p><p> </p><p>Suggest you do a daily "Google" news search on the search term "Teamsters" over a period of time, and compare the number of jobs lost by the Teamsters (as reported by the legitimate press) with those that are announced as "newly organized" or "gained" by glorious IBT press releases. Then come back with the information you gleaned and convince me that acting "hard-assed" has saved jobs.</p><p> </p><p>Think that, in the face of reality, that's something you'll have one Hell of hard time doing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PobreCarlos, post: 622858, member: 16651"] 705red; What "equals job loss in the long run" is union intransigence. Or do you think that the Teamsters lost 75% of the jobs they once held in their core industry because they "let supervisors work"? Get real! In truth, it's pricks that nickel 'n' dime every little management action that cause effective businesses to avoid Teamsters like the plague...and with good reason; the Teamster cause the companies they organize to go out of business ("Oh no! That's not right! After all, Central States is thriving!...grin!). And, obviously (although the point seems to escape most Teamsters!) when the businesses go, the jobs they provided go with 'em. One would think after the number of jobs the Teamsters (such as yourself) have pissed away in that fashion over the last few decades, that they would have learned by now. But apparently they haven't. Suggest you do a daily "Google" news search on the search term "Teamsters" over a period of time, and compare the number of jobs lost by the Teamsters (as reported by the legitimate press) with those that are announced as "newly organized" or "gained" by glorious IBT press releases. Then come back with the information you gleaned and convince me that acting "hard-assed" has saved jobs. Think that, in the face of reality, that's something you'll have one Hell of hard time doing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
getting paid for supervisors working?
Top