Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Glad I'm out of this Part2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 1817151" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>Mr. ITWF. It was created for me. Do you know how it happened?. Back in the early 1980's the courts ruled that if a company could prove that they had over contributed to the company pension plan the plan had to refund the excess contribution .Roadway's boy wonder Dan Sullivan picked up on it filed a claim for overpayment and won. The Teamster pension plan had to hork up a $300 million dollar refund and that's where Dan Sullivan got his money to start RPS.By the way have you guys put your company name on your uniforms and your name on your trucks. You know the unifroms that are speced by fxg but you have to pay for And the sign that goes on your trucks that are speced by x and place where they tell you put it? Do you know how all that came about? The 9th in it's ruling made pointed note of the fact that they had guys out there in what looked like company uniforms but we not company employees. Drove what looked like company trucks but were not company trucks and so the court brought up a very pointedquestion. The question? Deceptive business practices. Hey Mr. ITWBF. Don't simply dismiss the points that are being brought up........ disprove them. Bounty : I don't think he's a real contractor either. By the way Mr. ITWBF. 15 min. between stops is not a rural area and it's not a rural area if your tires are not on dirt or mud or hose poop or field stones. or home made bridges built out of rotten wooden planks.Yes, Mr. ITWBF. there is money to be made if you are willing to stoop low enough to get it and you are willing to place yourself under the complete of a company does not consider you worthy of being one of their employees. Consider this: the people who work for you have greater protection under the law than you. That's assuming that you really are who you say you are and I don't assume that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 1817151, member: 58386"] Mr. ITWF. It was created for me. Do you know how it happened?. Back in the early 1980's the courts ruled that if a company could prove that they had over contributed to the company pension plan the plan had to refund the excess contribution .Roadway's boy wonder Dan Sullivan picked up on it filed a claim for overpayment and won. The Teamster pension plan had to hork up a $300 million dollar refund and that's where Dan Sullivan got his money to start RPS.By the way have you guys put your company name on your uniforms and your name on your trucks. You know the unifroms that are speced by fxg but you have to pay for And the sign that goes on your trucks that are speced by x and place where they tell you put it? Do you know how all that came about? The 9th in it's ruling made pointed note of the fact that they had guys out there in what looked like company uniforms but we not company employees. Drove what looked like company trucks but were not company trucks and so the court brought up a very pointedquestion. The question? Deceptive business practices. Hey Mr. ITWBF. Don't simply dismiss the points that are being brought up........ disprove them. Bounty : I don't think he's a real contractor either. By the way Mr. ITWBF. 15 min. between stops is not a rural area and it's not a rural area if your tires are not on dirt or mud or hose poop or field stones. or home made bridges built out of rotten wooden planks.Yes, Mr. ITWBF. there is money to be made if you are willing to stoop low enough to get it and you are willing to place yourself under the complete of a company does not consider you worthy of being one of their employees. Consider this: the people who work for you have greater protection under the law than you. That's assuming that you really are who you say you are and I don't assume that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Glad I'm out of this Part2
Top