Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 4698733" data-attributes="member: 58386">Act 77 was passed last year by the GOP controlled by a 138-61 margin and the GOP controlled Senate by a 35-14 vote. They were all for it believing that mail in ballots would help to improve Trump&#039;s chances of carrying Pa. If fact they were so confident that it would improve Trump&#039;s chances that they allowed the timeline to challenge the law&#039;s constitutional merits to expire.The expired timeline combined with the plaintiffs failure to offer a single example of a mail in ballot being filed in a fraudulent manner is why the Pa. Supreme Court dismissed the suit unanimously .Pa. was widely believed to be the state that would decide the election and that turned out to be the caseI wonder who&#039;s going to pay the court costs? . The plaintiffs were asking in addition to the court ruling in the plaintiffs favor they also wanted the taxpayers to pay the costs involved.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bacha29, post: 4698733, member: 58386"] Act 77 was passed last year by the GOP controlled by a 138-61 margin and the GOP controlled Senate by a 35-14 vote. They were all for it believing that mail in ballots would help to improve Trump's chances of carrying Pa. If fact they were so confident that it would improve Trump's chances that they allowed the timeline to challenge the law's constitutional merits to expire. The expired timeline combined with the plaintiffs failure to offer a single example of a mail in ballot being filed in a fraudulent manner is why the Pa. Supreme Court dismissed the suit unanimously . Pa. was widely believed to be the state that would decide the election and that turned out to be the case I wonder who's going to pay the court costs? . The plaintiffs were asking in addition to the court ruling in the plaintiffs favor they also wanted the taxpayers to pay the costs involved. [/QUOTE]

Verification