Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Going off area with Telematics?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MC4YOU2" data-source="post: 843639" data-attributes="member: 5485"><p>OK, so the process was abused in the past, so I can see the reasoning for <em>some kind</em> of safeguard. Why not a master "undo" protocol that creates edit points on a daily or weekly basis allowing complete freedom to experiment with actual real world situations while maintaining the integrity of the complete system. So say if a PT Supe makes an error, the center manager or DM or IE can later go back to such and such a date on the old plans and <em>reset</em> and try again?</p><p></p><p>As for the ease of them just emailing someone upstream, I have heard the same stories from my on car and center manager as related to issues that need upstream approval before implementation can take place. Add to that also with the downsizing of mgmt staff last year, there are less mgmt covering more tasks. </p><p></p><p>My DM goes on vacay, my center manager gets the DM's workload, my oncar gets the center manager's workload, and the PT supes get.....well you know what they get. They really don't have time (or expertise?) to accomplish anything that saves time in the long run if it costs time today. </p><p></p><p>They are too busy doing the work of the PT hourlies to make the sort numbers look acceptable, while keeping up on the oncar's workload while he runs misloads from the PT supes who just get more and more frustrated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MC4YOU2, post: 843639, member: 5485"] OK, so the process was abused in the past, so I can see the reasoning for [I]some kind[/I] of safeguard. Why not a master "undo" protocol that creates edit points on a daily or weekly basis allowing complete freedom to experiment with actual real world situations while maintaining the integrity of the complete system. So say if a PT Supe makes an error, the center manager or DM or IE can later go back to such and such a date on the old plans and [I]reset[/I] and try again? As for the ease of them just emailing someone upstream, I have heard the same stories from my on car and center manager as related to issues that need upstream approval before implementation can take place. Add to that also with the downsizing of mgmt staff last year, there are less mgmt covering more tasks. My DM goes on vacay, my center manager gets the DM's workload, my oncar gets the center manager's workload, and the PT supes get.....well you know what they get. They really don't have time (or expertise?) to accomplish anything that saves time in the long run if it costs time today. They are too busy doing the work of the PT hourlies to make the sort numbers look acceptable, while keeping up on the oncar's workload while he runs misloads from the PT supes who just get more and more frustrated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Going off area with Telematics?
Top