Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Good Guys with Guns exercising First and Second amendment rights?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BMWMC" data-source="post: 5081857" data-attributes="member: 37461"><p>Try reread the post again.</p><p></p><p>"He'd been running for two block towards the police"?</p><p> That would mean he was at least two block PAST the police when he was identified by the crowd as an active shooter. FIRST! You can't be running towards police unless your were already far from them in the first place. </p><p>You CHOOSE to change the facts to suit your conclusions and it not only runs counter the evidence but your own claims. </p><p></p><p>I don't need to be directly threatens. The use of deadly force can be justified to prevent an assaults where you think great bodily injury might occur, a rape or kidnapping in progress, or child abduction. It doesn't matter if I knew or didn't know who was the aggressor or defender neither could be identified with any kind of official or unofficial powers. </p><p><strong><em>In fact, I would be even more justified taking Rittenhouse out because of his use of disproportional response. AR15 Vs Skateboard. </em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BMWMC, post: 5081857, member: 37461"] Try reread the post again. "He'd been running for two block towards the police"? That would mean he was at least two block PAST the police when he was identified by the crowd as an active shooter. FIRST! You can't be running towards police unless your were already far from them in the first place. You CHOOSE to change the facts to suit your conclusions and it not only runs counter the evidence but your own claims. I don't need to be directly threatens. The use of deadly force can be justified to prevent an assaults where you think great bodily injury might occur, a rape or kidnapping in progress, or child abduction. It doesn't matter if I knew or didn't know who was the aggressor or defender neither could be identified with any kind of official or unofficial powers. [B][I]In fact, I would be even more justified taking Rittenhouse out because of his use of disproportional response. AR15 Vs Skateboard. [/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Good Guys with Guns exercising First and Second amendment rights?
Top