Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Good Guys with Guns exercising First and Second amendment rights?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BMWMC" data-source="post: 5081866" data-attributes="member: 37461"><p>All I see him doing is a tactical repositioning. Looking for his own cover and concealment. My eyes are focused on the weapon and the shooter. Seeing him take down a guy wielding a skateboard would be to me a hot shoot and taking him out because of his application of a disproportional response, the right call in that situation. </p><p> Like the prosecutor said; you can't be the instigator and claim self-defenses. I don't agree with the verdict but understand it based current the current permissive gun and self-defense laws. That's why I presented a counter scenario which has just as much a probability of winning a self-defense clam as Rittenhouse had. Which highlights the strange fate and ambiguities of gun ownership and self-defense claims. </p><p></p><p>"how are you the self defense hero when he did not attack you."</p><p></p><p> I already answered this in another post but I have every right to shoot to kill anyone who I reasonably believe is about to cause great bodily injury, rape or kidnaping, or child abduction. Many states have even more lack requirement than that. Many state allow you to shoot to kill people who you believe are stealing property or about to steal yours. That's the Rittenhouse defense. He was afraid the very weapon he brought to make him safe, which turned out to put his own life in jeopardy, as people saw him with this weapon as someone there NOT to help but to harm them. </p><p></p><p>Your not paying attention to the arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BMWMC, post: 5081866, member: 37461"] All I see him doing is a tactical repositioning. Looking for his own cover and concealment. My eyes are focused on the weapon and the shooter. Seeing him take down a guy wielding a skateboard would be to me a hot shoot and taking him out because of his application of a disproportional response, the right call in that situation. Like the prosecutor said; you can't be the instigator and claim self-defenses. I don't agree with the verdict but understand it based current the current permissive gun and self-defense laws. That's why I presented a counter scenario which has just as much a probability of winning a self-defense clam as Rittenhouse had. Which highlights the strange fate and ambiguities of gun ownership and self-defense claims. "how are you the self defense hero when he did not attack you." I already answered this in another post but I have every right to shoot to kill anyone who I reasonably believe is about to cause great bodily injury, rape or kidnaping, or child abduction. Many states have even more lack requirement than that. Many state allow you to shoot to kill people who you believe are stealing property or about to steal yours. That's the Rittenhouse defense. He was afraid the very weapon he brought to make him safe, which turned out to put his own life in jeopardy, as people saw him with this weapon as someone there NOT to help but to harm them. Your not paying attention to the arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Good Guys with Guns exercising First and Second amendment rights?
Top