Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Ground to absorb Express
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="59 Dano" data-source="post: 3511635" data-attributes="member: 23516"><p>LOL. And then FedEx would be responsible for recruiting those employees, which is an added expense. And screening them, which is an added expense. And interviewing them, which is an added expense. And taking on the liability for them, which is an added expense. And handling the turnover, which is an added expense. </p><p></p><p>None of that figures in the additional admin support staff that would be required.</p><p></p><p>As it stands now, FedEx offers the ISP a lopsided contract, lets the ISP have all of those headaches, and pockets a 13% (or whatever it is now) return without breaking a sweat. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I seem to think that making an easy 13% return on your money with essentially no effort or liability is better than making a lower return on that money with more effort and liability. Just because you have a complex idea doesn't mean it's a good one. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Or they can do none of it, put all the responsibility onto someone else, and still make a buttload of money. Guess which option they've chosen?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="59 Dano, post: 3511635, member: 23516"] LOL. And then FedEx would be responsible for recruiting those employees, which is an added expense. And screening them, which is an added expense. And interviewing them, which is an added expense. And taking on the liability for them, which is an added expense. And handling the turnover, which is an added expense. None of that figures in the additional admin support staff that would be required. As it stands now, FedEx offers the ISP a lopsided contract, lets the ISP have all of those headaches, and pockets a 13% (or whatever it is now) return without breaking a sweat. I seem to think that making an easy 13% return on your money with essentially no effort or liability is better than making a lower return on that money with more effort and liability. Just because you have a complex idea doesn't mean it's a good one. Or they can do none of it, put all the responsibility onto someone else, and still make a buttload of money. Guess which option they've chosen? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Ground to absorb Express
Top