Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Guns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Box Ox" data-source="post: 5371628" data-attributes="member: 48469"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://thereload.com/new-york-uses-historic-gun-bans-for-native-americans-catholics-to-justify-current-restrictions-in-court/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld.</p><p></p><p>New York cited historical bans on gun ownership by Native Americans and Catholics to support its current concealed-carry permitting law. The state argued in <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.133602/gov.uscourts.nynd.133602.19.0.pdf" target="_blank">a Monday filing</a> its “good moral character” clause, which allows officials to deny permits to those they don’t feel are good people, is rooted in the historical tradition of “Anglo-American” gun regulations. It first pointed to several colonial gun bans as analogous to its own law.</p><p></p><p>“From the early days of English settlement in America, the colonies sought to prevent Native American tribes from acquiring firearms, passing laws forbidding the sale and trading of arms to Indigenous people,” the filing from the office of Attorney General Letitia James (D.) reads.</p><p></p><p>New York then cited historical laws in England and America denying people their gun rights based on religion as another example of the tradition its requirement is based in.</p><p></p><p>“[E]ven after the English Bill of Rights established a right of the people to arm themselves, the right was only given to Protestants, based on a continued belief that Catholics were likely to engage in conduct that would harm themselves or others and upset the peace,” the filing said.</p><p></p><p>The arguments come in an effort to save the subjective standard for issuing permits after the Supreme Court struck down the state’s similarly subjective “good reason” clause earlier this year <a href="https://thereload.com/supreme-court-strikes-down-new-york-gun-carry-law/" target="_blank">in <em>New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen</em></a>. That case also established a new standard for reviewing Second Amendment cases that involves proving regulations are rooted in tradition from the time of the founding.</p><p></p><p>New York resorting to examples of openly racist or bigoted laws as analogs indicates they may have a difficult time convincing courts it is constitutional. That’s especially true if the case makes its way back up to the Supreme Court, where five of the nine justices themselves are Catholic."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Box Ox, post: 5371628, member: 48469"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://thereload.com/new-york-uses-historic-gun-bans-for-native-americans-catholics-to-justify-current-restrictions-in-court/[/URL] "The Empire State believes its gun-carry restrictions are similar to racist gun bans from the past, and that’s why they should be upheld. New York cited historical bans on gun ownership by Native Americans and Catholics to support its current concealed-carry permitting law. The state argued in [URL='https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.133602/gov.uscourts.nynd.133602.19.0.pdf']a Monday filing[/URL] its “good moral character” clause, which allows officials to deny permits to those they don’t feel are good people, is rooted in the historical tradition of “Anglo-American” gun regulations. It first pointed to several colonial gun bans as analogous to its own law. “From the early days of English settlement in America, the colonies sought to prevent Native American tribes from acquiring firearms, passing laws forbidding the sale and trading of arms to Indigenous people,” the filing from the office of Attorney General Letitia James (D.) reads. New York then cited historical laws in England and America denying people their gun rights based on religion as another example of the tradition its requirement is based in. “[E]ven after the English Bill of Rights established a right of the people to arm themselves, the right was only given to Protestants, based on a continued belief that Catholics were likely to engage in conduct that would harm themselves or others and upset the peace,” the filing said. The arguments come in an effort to save the subjective standard for issuing permits after the Supreme Court struck down the state’s similarly subjective “good reason” clause earlier this year [URL='https://thereload.com/supreme-court-strikes-down-new-york-gun-carry-law/']in [I]New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen[/I][/URL]. That case also established a new standard for reviewing Second Amendment cases that involves proving regulations are rooted in tradition from the time of the founding. New York resorting to examples of openly racist or bigoted laws as analogs indicates they may have a difficult time convincing courts it is constitutional. That’s especially true if the case makes its way back up to the Supreme Court, where five of the nine justices themselves are Catholic." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Guns
Top