Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Hate Should Not Be A Crime!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="diesel96" data-source="post: 634905" data-attributes="member: 9859"><p>You two don't want to go there. Starting with Bush, Chaney, Rove, Rumsfeld,(all under investigation at one point or another), convicted felons Liddy, Ollie North....What's not startling is Fox News employs half those guys, and offers free hot air time to Cheney and his manchurian daughter.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Back in the day, when our forefathers were authoring the Constitution(including the 2nd Amend) they're weapontry consisted of what ? Black Powder muzzle loaded muskets, flintlock pistols, swords, bayonets, and a few cannons ? How does today's weapontry differ from yesteryear. Pretty safe to assume if one side had today's weapons the Amer Rev War would have been over rather quickly and decisively unless the inferior side develope Guerilla warfare. But thats another can of worms.</p><p> </p><p> Back in the day, do you think our forefathers had the visions of laser guided fully automatic handheld machine guns, amor piercing bullets, Lars rockets, and SAMS in the hands of it's mentally challenged untested citizens. Maybe back then, visions of hi-tech weapons were predicted and ownership could be argued with organized citizen milita's or security forces at best, but one is certainly not an idiot realizing todays weapons are so far advanced and available legally or illegally to just about any wild eyed motivated citizen, with the potential to inflict destruction of biblical proportions in an era such as the 1700's equal to that of a Chemical or biological weapon. So interpeting this amendment to custom fit your "Big Gun" self righteous egotistical, for lack of a better word, small penis, is a long stretch, at best, as logic. Nuff said on this subject, Jones is right ! We are wavering in a wayward direction on this thread.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Thx Kmac. Back to Hate Crimes.</p><p>I know where your coming from with your views, but my POV is that everyone is over thinking this and speculating the advancement of the worst possible scenario.</p><p>Like it's been stated before, Hate Crimes statues are already written into many state law books. This new add on legislation is simply trying to avert "gay bashing" as a sport....Would the Libertarian creators of "South Park" want any unjustufied harm come to "Big Gay Al ?"....<img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":wink2:" title="Wink :wink2:" data-shortname=":wink2:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="diesel96, post: 634905, member: 9859"] You two don't want to go there. Starting with Bush, Chaney, Rove, Rumsfeld,(all under investigation at one point or another), convicted felons Liddy, Ollie North....What's not startling is Fox News employs half those guys, and offers free hot air time to Cheney and his manchurian daughter. Back in the day, when our forefathers were authoring the Constitution(including the 2nd Amend) they're weapontry consisted of what ? Black Powder muzzle loaded muskets, flintlock pistols, swords, bayonets, and a few cannons ? How does today's weapontry differ from yesteryear. Pretty safe to assume if one side had today's weapons the Amer Rev War would have been over rather quickly and decisively unless the inferior side develope Guerilla warfare. But thats another can of worms. Back in the day, do you think our forefathers had the visions of laser guided fully automatic handheld machine guns, amor piercing bullets, Lars rockets, and SAMS in the hands of it's mentally challenged untested citizens. Maybe back then, visions of hi-tech weapons were predicted and ownership could be argued with organized citizen milita's or security forces at best, but one is certainly not an idiot realizing todays weapons are so far advanced and available legally or illegally to just about any wild eyed motivated citizen, with the potential to inflict destruction of biblical proportions in an era such as the 1700's equal to that of a Chemical or biological weapon. So interpeting this amendment to custom fit your "Big Gun" self righteous egotistical, for lack of a better word, small penis, is a long stretch, at best, as logic. Nuff said on this subject, Jones is right ! We are wavering in a wayward direction on this thread. Thx Kmac. Back to Hate Crimes. I know where your coming from with your views, but my POV is that everyone is over thinking this and speculating the advancement of the worst possible scenario. Like it's been stated before, Hate Crimes statues are already written into many state law books. This new add on legislation is simply trying to avert "gay bashing" as a sport....Would the Libertarian creators of "South Park" want any unjustufied harm come to "Big Gay Al ?"....:wink2: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Hate Should Not Be A Crime!
Top