Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="smells like godzilla" data-source="post: 1654230" data-attributes="member: 47003">Does it say on there that the old guard cut a deal that new hires would be hired under the 2011 hiring rates in 2013 &amp; 2014? Imagine the questions when those new members looked at the contract book.Besides the numbers being wrong, does it say that the 2009 raises were negotiated away, lowered and pushed to 2010?Does it say the employer intended the last raise to be a two year raise?Does it mention the ratification bonus in the new deal?Does it say there were secret deals giving temporary workers the right to take jobs over seniority workers? Temps could take overtime away from seniority workers? Does it mention any of the language improvements in the new contract? It&#039;s definitely not the complete picture. The contract the employer wanted, and the authors of that leaflet cheered for, had real concessions. The ratified deal: not concessionary.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="smells like godzilla, post: 1654230, member: 47003"] Does it say on there that the old guard cut a deal that new hires would be hired under the 2011 hiring rates in 2013 & 2014? Imagine the questions when those new members looked at the contract book. Besides the numbers being wrong, does it say that the 2009 raises were negotiated away, lowered and pushed to 2010? Does it say the employer intended the last raise to be a two year raise? Does it mention the ratification bonus in the new deal? Does it say there were secret deals giving temporary workers the right to take jobs over seniority workers? Temps could take overtime away from seniority workers? Does it mention any of the language improvements in the new contract? It's definitely not the complete picture. The contract the employer wanted, and the authors of that leaflet cheered for, had real concessions. The ratified deal: not concessionary. [/QUOTE]

Verification