Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
homeland security
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="roadrunner2012" data-source="post: 961494" data-attributes="member: 40736"><p>From your Breitbart article (how did he die, btw?):</p><p></p><p><em>[The] bill has two components: One is Castle Doctrine, which presumes you are justified in the use of force if you believe you are in danger of serious bodily harm or death within your home or occupied vehicle. The second and most significant component is the return of the burden of proof in self-defense cases to the state, so law-abiding citizens who are forced to actually use their firearms or other means of protection for self-defense will not be wrongfully imprisoned or financially devastated by costs associated with their legal defense. They will once again be presumed innocent – consistent with the American system of justice.</em></p><p></p><p>Yep, the perp is in my home or vehicle, I can defend myself. I can't hunt him down on a public street for no reason, other than 'looks funny'.</p><p></p><p>Talk about marginalization of your argument, geesh.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="roadrunner2012, post: 961494, member: 40736"] From your Breitbart article (how did he die, btw?): [I][The] bill has two components: One is Castle Doctrine, which presumes you are justified in the use of force if you believe you are in danger of serious bodily harm or death within your home or occupied vehicle. The second and most significant component is the return of the burden of proof in self-defense cases to the state, so law-abiding citizens who are forced to actually use their firearms or other means of protection for self-defense will not be wrongfully imprisoned or financially devastated by costs associated with their legal defense. They will once again be presumed innocent – consistent with the American system of justice.[/I] Yep, the perp is in my home or vehicle, I can defend myself. I can't hunt him down on a public street for no reason, other than 'looks funny'. Talk about marginalization of your argument, geesh. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
homeland security
Top