Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 5302648" data-attributes="member: 63706">Employees should refuse to work in unsafe situations, yet they don&#039;t, some because they are fooled into believing the company they work for wouldn&#039;t let them get hurt.But one vote one person will change that, right?The rights are all there, the way they are enforced and upheld change with people&#039;s beliefs. Many argued at the inception that the constitution, as originally written, made slavery an impossibility. But the attitudes of people at the time overrode the constitution. Just like the attitudes of people today overrides the constitution when they allow lock downs and forced medical experimentation and child sterilization.The constitution is not there to protect democracy. It&#039;s there to limit government so as to protect people&#039;s rights. As originally written, the constitution does not differentiate between wealthy and poor. It was people&#039;s attitudes that caused them to read things into it that aren&#039;t there.The way to get rid of it is for people to take responsibility for themselves, not blame others for their problems, and not demand government do whatever they want.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 5302648, member: 63706"] Employees should refuse to work in unsafe situations, yet they don't, some because they are fooled into believing the company they work for wouldn't let them get hurt. But one vote one person will change that, right? The rights are all there, the way they are enforced and upheld change with people's beliefs. Many argued at the inception that the constitution, as originally written, made slavery an impossibility. But the attitudes of people at the time overrode the constitution. Just like the attitudes of people today overrides the constitution when they allow lock downs and forced medical experimentation and child sterilization. The constitution is not there to protect democracy. It's there to limit government so as to protect people's rights. As originally written, the constitution does not differentiate between wealthy and poor. It was people's attitudes that caused them to read things into it that aren't there. The way to get rid of it is for people to take responsibility for themselves, not blame others for their problems, and not demand government do whatever they want. [/QUOTE]

Verification